Consumer financial protection remains a central issue in the debate over how financial services should be regulated. While regulatory agencies are intended to protect consumers and promote confidence in the financial system, consumers may not always agree with regulators about the appropriate balance between protection and individual choice.
Survey research from the Cato Institute examines how Americans view financial regulation and the role of agencies such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The findings raise questions about whether consumers prefer regulators to restrict potentially risky financial products or provide individuals with greater freedom to make their own financial decisions.
Those working in financial services often have formed opinions about the various regulatory bodies that have oversight and authority over the industry. The Cato Institute conducted a survey to find out what the general population believes about the effectiveness of financial regulators. As it turns out, they have opinions on the topic as well. The Competitive Enterprise Institute provided some analysis on the survey and concludes that consumers generally are not convinced that regulators have made financial services better or safer. In particular, survey respondents are unsure that the CFPB has their best interests at heart:
A major political fight today surrounds the role of government regulation in consumer financial protection. At the helm is the highly controversial CFPB, the brain child of Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), who advocates rooting out financial products that may be harmful to consumers.
Yet this is at odds with what the majority of Americans want from consumer protection. Director of polling with the Cato Institute, Emily Ekins found that restricting access to risky financial products is a priority for only 13% of respondents. On the other hand, most said that governments should allow individuals to make their own financial decisions, even if they make the wrong ones.
The CFPB, however, has taken just the opposite approach. Through regulations covering payday loans, prepaid debit cards, and even contractual agreements on lawsuits, the agency has taken it upon itself to make American’s financial decisions for them. This does not bode well for consumers. As a result of many of their rulemakings, millions of Americans have found it more difficult to get a mortgage or access credit to start a business. The CFPB has ignored the kind of consumer protection that American’s are looking for, instead preferring to strip consumers of choice and responsibility.
The debate over consumer financial protection ultimately involves balancing access, choice, and safeguards against potentially harmful financial practices. Regulations intended to protect consumers can affect which products financial institutions offer, how those products are structured, and which customers are able to obtain them.
The survey findings presented here suggest that many consumers place substantial value on making their own financial decisions, even when those decisions involve risk. That perspective can conflict with a regulatory approach that limits access to certain products because policymakers believe those products could cause financial harm.
For financial institutions, these competing priorities create an ongoing challenge. Banks, credit unions, lenders, and other providers must comply with regulatory requirements while continuing to offer products that meet consumers’ financial needs. Changes involving mortgages, small-dollar lending, prepaid cards, and other services can therefore have consequences for both consumer protection and access to financial products.
As policymakers continue evaluating the appropriate role of financial regulators, consumer attitudes will remain an important part of the discussion. Effective consumer financial protection will require regulators and financial institutions to consider how safeguards can address genuine risks while preserving reasonable access, transparency, and consumer choice.
Overview by Sarah Grotta, Director, Debit Advisory Service at Mercator Advisory Group
Read the full story here