PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

11 Smart Contract Platforms Reviewed but No Talk of “Fitness for Use”

By Tim Sloane
January 31, 2022
in Analysts Coverage, Blockchain, Digital Assets & Crypto
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
11 Smart Contract Platforms Reviewed but No Talk of “Fitness for Use”

11 Smart Contract Platforms Reviewed but No Talk of “Fitness for Use”

Can a distributed finance solution be implemented on an island? Consider a commodity exchange interested in deploying smart contracts. Since the contracts must be tightly coupled to the products the exchange controls, what advantage does a distributed infrastructure deliver? Primarily it adds complexity and risk in return for a distributed environment that is of little use. If my startup company wants to issue shares using smart contracts, I need to select a platform and write the smart contract. People interested in buying shares now need to have the proper funds associated with the blockchain running that smart contract and they need to trust the smart contract is safe and reliable, and they need to trust the company they are buying the stock from since there is no organization validating that the company is real. So we have not only eliminated the need for centralized trust, we have spread trust out across multiple participants that are in themselves very difficult to properly validate.

These are problems similar to those associated with blockchains. There are use cases where a blockchain makes perfect sense but not every situation is aligned with the benefits and drawbacks of a blockchain. There are those that argue a blockchain delivers trust unassociated with a central organization, but that’s simply not true. Each blockchain, including Bitcoin, has a management team that decides what changes will be made. This decision gets harder and harder to make the more use cases execute on top of the platform and as the platform is more broadly deployed. This suggests that a private blockchain may often be most appropriate, but this means participants must once again trust other participating entities.

All of this hasn’t even touched on the trust that needs to be associated with the smart contract itself, and written in a Turing Complete software development environment, such as used on Ethereum. This means that the smart contract can do almost anything, it’s similar to writing software in the language C. So how is the code validated? By whom? By the unvetted company offering you shares? Again, there are likely use cases that make perfect sense for this technology platform but I doubt those use cases will prove to be as broad as currently claimed:

“Even though Ethereum is the world’s most popular smart contract platform, many have pointed out flaws in its armour. Several of these flaws include poor transaction speeds as a result of congestion, high fees, as well as significant power usage. While the Ethereum 2 upgrade is set to tackle these issues, many Ethereum competitors have arrived on the scene to solve these issues and steal Ethereum’s market dominance. 

Who are Ethereum’s competitors?

Blockchains are constantly evolving and improving as each new blockchain tries to solve the problems of the other. This has started a race to see which blockchain can emerge victorious as the “Ethereum Killer”. Blockchains that are trying to do just that are Solana, Binance, Cardano, Terra and Polkadot, amongst others. Let’s have a look at some of these competitors and what they have to offer.

11 Smart Contract Platforms Reviewed but No Talk of "Fitness for Use"
Note: TPS = Transactions per second. TVL = Total Value Locked”

Overview by Tim Sloane, VP, Payments Innovation at Mercator Advisory Group

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: BlockchainEthereumSmart Contracts

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    cross-border tokenized deposits

    Ant International and HSBC Pilot Cross-Border Tokenized Deposit Transfers on Swift

    December 12, 2025
    Fiserv stablecoin

    Three Small Business Trends That Banks Can Hop On in 2026

    December 11, 2025
    echeck

    Beyond Paper: Why More Businesses Are Turning to eChecks

    December 10, 2025
    metal cards

    Leveraging Metal Cards to Attract High-Value Customers

    December 9, 2025
    fraud as a service

    Keeping Up with the Most Dangerous Fraud Trends of 2026

    December 8, 2025
    open banking

    Open Banking Has Begun to Intrude on Banks’ Customer Relationships

    December 5, 2025
    conversational payments

    Conversational Payments: The Next Big Shift in Financial Services  

    December 4, 2025
    embedded finance

    Inside the Embedded Finance Shift Transforming SMB Software

    December 3, 2025

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2024 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result