PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Banking Fraud and Social Networking

By Stu Sjouwerman
June 28, 2016
in Industry Opinions
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
payment acceptance

hand drawn texture globe on laptop computer as internet concept

Criminals can use social networking venues, such as Facebook and Twitter, the same way they use email and texting to perpetrate crimes against individuals and organizations.

A cybercrook can spoof a Facebook or Twitter account, and then send a Facebook message or Tweet to an SME employee on the weekend. The message might purport to be from a coworker, requesting that person’s login information because the “coworker” forgot his or her own and needs it to finish an important project. If the SME employee takes the message at face value and doesn’t use another means of verifying the sender’s identity, he or she may end up transmitting the login information to a malicious person. That person then has access to whatever accounts, records, and assets the SME employee manages.

If the employee has access to the company’s bank accounts, the malicious person can drain large sums of money or other resources, and the soonest the crime will be discovered is the following Monday. The SME employee will be left holding the “smoking gun.”

SMEs Vulnerable to Banking Scams

In 2012, a survey conducted by Ponemon Institute and Guardian Analytics [24] revealed some startling facts about how vulnerable SMEs are to banking scams:

• Of the 998 SMEs surveyed, 52% had experienced a fraud attack within the preceding year, and 74% say their businesses experienced online fraud.

• Of the SMEs that had experienced attacks, 59% failed to recover their lost funds.

• About 75% of the banks included in the survey failed to detect fraud prior to funds being transferred.

Many SMEs aren’t covered under private fraud insurance.

In addition to having their employees divulge sensitive data as a result of phishing and other social engineering scams, bank accounts for SMEs are vulnerable to the same sort of attacks as personal bank accounts.

SMEs and Banking Trojans

Malicious persons can take advantage of unpatched computer vulnerabilities. Newly developed malware is designed to go undetected by traditional antivirus solutions. Various malware types can gather sensitive data from SME computers and servers, including banking authentication information. A single swift attack can remove hundreds of thousands of dollars from an SME’s bank account in a short time. Because SMEs traditionally don’t monitor their bank accounts daily, the theft might go undiscovered for days.

The probability of recovering the stolen funds declines sharply more than 24 hours after the theft.

Banks aren’t obligated to reimburse victim SMEs for their losses. However, they do generally work with a company to attempt to reverse any fraudulent asset transfers. However, the window for doing so successfully is only about 24 hours. Corporate accounts are responsible for any Automated Clearing House (ACH) debits after two days. If an SME fails to review its corporate bank accounts daily, it may not discover the fraudulent money transfers in time to avoid liability.

Large-Scale ACH Fraud

A single SME’s loss may not draw the attention of federal authorities, but the combined losses of a large number of SMEs will.

ACH fraud takes advantage of computer vulnerabilities and malware to transfer millions of dollars in bank funds out of numerous SME accounts. The fraudsters parcel those funds out to money mules—people who are duped into thinking that they are managing payroll transfers for international companies. The mules receive money transfers of less than $10,000 per transfer to avoid triggering a suspicious activity report (SAR) from the bank. Once the mule makes the required overseas wire transfer, those funds are gone forever.

Amounts as low as $5,000 can trigger a SAR. However, the mandatory requirement is for amounts of $10,000 or more. Therefore, most ACH fraud transactions are around $9,000.
The ACH scamming mechanism is an example of spear phishing.

Payroll Fraud

Sometimes, malicious parties can add themselves or their proxies to the payroll of an SME. When the bank issues biweekly electronic paychecks, the fraudsters are “paid” along with the real employees. Remarkably, individuals can be added to a company’s payroll at the SME’s bank of record without the required documentation (for example, a canceled check or deposit slip from the employee’s bank or a completed payroll authorization form). In this case, the bank, not the SME, has failed to take the proper protective measures.

This type of fraud requires a coordinated effort, including soliciting the services of a large number of money mules. However, the rewards for the thieves are vast, and the money mules are expendable.


KnowBe4 hosts the world’s most popular integrated SecurityAwareness Training and Simulated Phishing platform. Realizing that the humanelement of security was being seriously neglected, Sjouwerman teamed with KevinMitnick, the world’s most famous hacker, to help organizations manage theproblem of cybercrime social engineering tactics through new school security

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: Banking ChannelsFraud Risk and Analytics

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    metal cards

    Leveraging Metal Cards to Attract High-Value Customers

    December 9, 2025
    fraud as a service

    Keeping Up with the Most Dangerous Fraud Trends of 2026

    December 8, 2025
    open banking

    Open Banking Has Begun to Intrude on Banks’ Customer Relationships

    December 5, 2025
    conversational payments

    Conversational Payments: The Next Big Shift in Financial Services  

    December 4, 2025
    embedded finance

    Inside the Embedded Finance Shift Transforming SMB Software

    December 3, 2025
    metal cards

    Metal Card Magnitude: How a Premium Touch Can Enthrall High-Value Customers

    December 2, 2025
    digital gift cards

    How Nonprofits Can Leverage Digital Gift Cards to Help Those in Need

    December 1, 2025
    stored-value prepaid

    How Stored-Value Accounts Are the Next Iteration of Prepaid Payments

    November 26, 2025

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2024 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result