PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

CFPB Warns of the Dangers of Virtual World Banking

By Wesley Grant
April 9, 2024
in Analysts Coverage, Digital Banking
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Little boy playing a mobile game against his sister

Little boy playing a mobile game against his sister

Virtual worlds like Roblox, Fortnite, and Minecraft offer highly immersive experiences, and making in-game purchases through these platforms has become commonplace. It has also become costly, with Americans spending $56.6 billion on gaming hardware and content in 2022.

The rise in virtual marketplace transactions presents unique risks, according to a recent report from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The CFPB’s central critique is that “metaverse” marketplaces have been modeled after digital banking and payment systems, but don’t offer any of the protections.

As a result, virtual worlds have left their users open to account theft and fraudulent transactions, which can have significant financial impacts. The CFPB also raised concerns about ambiguous transaction fees and the amount of surveillance data the platforms collect about their users.

A Haven for Scams

In a statement accompanying the report, CFPB Director Rohit Chopra called virtual worlds “a haven for scams, fraud, financial losses, and unanticipated purchases that can deplete a family’s real-world financial assets.” Chopra emphasized that gaming platforms skew toward a younger audience that are often more vulnerable to fraudsters.

Because users are spending gaming credits in metaverse transactions, it can seem like real money isn’t changing hands. The CFPB also made it clear that gaming assets are not equivalent to gift cards. Gaming assets can be sold and traded between users and their value can fluctuate. Game publishers can even manipulate an asset’s worth.

Gaming asset values have skyrocketed as third-party websites have sprung up to facilitate trading, as proven by the 2023 sale of a Counter-Strike metaverse “skin” for $500,000. The CFPB was disturbed by the rise of the skin gambling industry on third-party sites, where users wager virtual-world skins in casino games like blackjack or roulette.

Rife With Hidden Fees

The conversion of traditional currencies to gaming credits is another sticking point. Many virtual worlds sell credits in currency bundles, and it’s not always clear just how much a user is paying.

The currency conversion rate is not readily apparent either. Buying 100,000 in Roblox credits costs $1,000, but selling that same amount will only net $350. In addition, some platforms charge hidden transaction fees upon cash-out, and some enforce minimum credit balances before they let users withdraw.

Because cashing out is handled by third-party websites, there are increased opportunities to commit account fraud or steal gaming assets. The CFPB warned that user data collected by gaming companies can be sold or traded, and its report raised alarms that surveillance data on user behavioral patterns could be leveraged by gaming publishers to induce elevated spending.

The CFPB also noted that if users dispute transactions, oftentimes their accounts will be suspended or terminated. Chopra said the CFPB will continue to assess virtual world financial practices, and that users should take a hard look at the virtual transactions they and their children are making.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: FortniteGamingin-game transactionsMetaverseVirtual Worlds

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Extends Mandate for Tokenization to June '22

    Late Payments? Governments Are Taking Action

    February 9, 2026
    ai phishing

    The Fraud Epidemic Is Testing the Limits of Cybersecurity

    February 6, 2026
    stablecoins b2b payments

    Stablecoins and the Future of B2B Payments: Faster, Cheaper, Better

    February 5, 2026
    Payment Facilitator

    The Payment Facilitator Model as a Growth Strategy for ISVs

    February 4, 2026
    Simplifying Payment Processing? Payment Orchestration Can Help , multi-acquiring merchants

    Multi-Acquiring Is the New Standard—Are Merchants Ready?

    February 3, 2026
    ACH Network, credit-push fraud, ACH payments growth

    What’s Driving the Rapid Growth in ACH Payments

    February 2, 2026
    chatgpt payments

    How Merchants Should Navigate the Rise of Agentic AI

    January 30, 2026
    fraud passkey

    Why the Future of Financial Fraud Prevention Is Passwordless

    January 29, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2024 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result