PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Minnesota Is the Latest State to Allow Banks to Custody Crypto

By Tom Nawrocki
May 19, 2026
in Analysts Coverage, Digital Assets & Crypto
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
mastercard agentic commerce

A digital rendering of a bank building constructed over a circuit board, symbolizing the evolving world of finance. This image can be used for presentations or articles related to online banking, fintech, and the future of financial services.

As cryptocurrency moves deeper into the financial mainstream, Minnesota is opening the door for local banks and credit unions to compete in the digital asset economy. Beginning August 1, the state will allow financial institutions to offer crypto custody services, giving customers a regulated, local option for storing cryptocurrency.

Minnesota joins a growing list of states—including New York, Virginia, and Wyoming—that permit certain banks to custody crypto assets. The law authorizes Minnesota financial institutions to provide virtual-currency custody services in a nonfiduciary capacity and to work with third-party service providers or subcustodians. Institutions may also control the private keys—the secure credentials required to access wallets holding digital assets.

Protections for Investors

The bill also includes a number of safeguards for investors, beginning with the requirement that client assets be segregated from the institutions’ own assets. Banks and credit unions must maintain written policies governing risk management, internal controls, and cybersecurity. At least 60 days before taking custody of any crypto assets, institutions must submit written notice to the Minnesota Commissioner of Commerce describing those compliance measures.

“This is another sign that crypto is being pulled deeper into the regulated financial system,” said Joel Hugentobler, Cryptocurrency Analyst at Javelin Strategy & Research. “States are increasingly wanting existing compliance, risk management and security frameworks to apply to digital assets to build trust and capture fees.”

Leaving Room for Crypto Firms

Rep. Bernie Perryman, one of the bill’s primary sponsors, said the legislation is intended to ensure that Minnesota-based financial institutions can “evolve alongside their customers and members rather than forcing Minnesotans to rely on unregulated, out-of-state or offshore providers for services that are already in use today.”

That may sound like a challenge to established crypto custody firms such as Coinbase, but  those companies are still likely to play a major role in the digital asset landscape. Traditional financial institutions will likely appeal to newer crypto investors looking for familiar, regulated providers, while experienced crypto users may continue to prefer established native-crypto platforms.

“This raises competition for sure, but Coinbase still has an edge in infrastructure, liquidity, wallets, and UI, so I don’t think it is as big of a threat to them as some might think,” Hugentobler said. “I’d imagine, over time, the market shifts towards more partnerships with embedded infrastructure rather than a winner takes all.”

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: BanksCoinbaseCredit UnionsCrypto CustodiansCryptocurrencyMinnesota

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    BIS Wants Central Banks to Move Faster with CBDC amid Looming Stablecoin Pressure

    The Next Phase for Prepaid Cards Could Be Stablecoins

    May 29, 2026
    Synthetic Identities

    A Victimless Crime: Why Synthetic Identities Demand Layered Verification

    May 28, 2026

    Stablecoins Are Turning the Remittance Business Model on Its Head

    May 27, 2026
    legacy banking, instant payments

    The Instant Payments Shift Is Testing the Limits of Legacy Banking

    May 26, 2026
    innovation

    Companies No Longer Dabble in Innovation, They Prioritize It

    May 22, 2026
    klarna debit card

    Why Too Many Banks Are Losing Out on Merchant Services

    May 21, 2026
    embedded payments

    Embedded Payments Are Becoming Core to Vertical SaaS

    May 20, 2026
    palm scan

    Identity Fraud and the Erosion of Trust in the Age of AI

    May 19, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result