PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

What Is Delaying Adoption of Electronic IDs?

By Tim Sloane
February 11, 2019
in Analysts Coverage, Biometrics, Emerging Payments, Fraud & Security, Security
0
2
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on LinkedIn
Now anyone can track you down using just your picture

Now anyone can track you down using just your picture

This article in Finastra suggests that the electronic ID (eID) is delayed because the technology suppliers and FIDO Alliance “does not create an effective commercial value chain:”

With mobile phone and integration of connected devices technologies improving the security and user experience for digital services.  The use of biometric sensors in devices require companies to relying on and to trust the device and the associated biometric infrastructure.  This is becoming an ‘implicit’ trust framework, with no 3rd party liability no the manufacturer of the biometric device.  The FIDO (Fast ID Online) alliance has created a framework to exploit the biometric sensors in devices to unlock eID credentials.   However, this framework does not create an effective commercial value chain.

This is the issue that hampered NFC mobile payment deployment with multiple technical solutions but no workable commercial model.  That was before the NFC card tokenisation commercial model was defined, created and deployed initially by ‘ApplePay’.  This model created an effective commercial relationship as the ‘token provider’ is paid for providing the service either each time a payment is made by consumer or the token is created.  The international card schemes were key stakeholders that define, enforce and facilitate the commercial model between card issuer and merchant acquirers for mobile NFC payments.”

I disagree. There is a significant financial incentive for authenticators to adopt the mobile device security model as exposed by FIDO. The authenticator no longer needs to pay for the device, the authentication is more reliable than a password, and consumers will no longer forget the password which drives users away and costs the authenticator money. The problem is the age-old challenge of a 2 sided market. The authenticator needs a large market to use biometrics before it will invest in the technology. While 67% of smartphones have biometric tech, very few consumers use it because it doesn’t unlock enough apps and websites.

Besides, the payment networks are encouraging the use of biometrics with the introduction of 3D Secure 2. While this new eCommerce security protocol doesn’t mandate biometrics it does require an out of band user authentication for suspicious transactions. Smart banks that want to offer consumers a convenient method of identification should enable their banking app to also offer a biometric authentication method.

Overview by Tim Sloane, VP, Payments Innovation at Mercator Advisory Group

2
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on LinkedIn
Tags: AuthenticationBiometricsFIDOSecurity

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    AI in payment collections

    From Data to Action: How Automated Intelligence Is Changing Collections

    September 22, 2026
    circle stablecoin

    As Prepaid Fraud Evolves, So Do the Rules

    September 21, 2026
    bots fraud, bank security in data sharing, J.P. Morgan fraud protection TSYS, 3D Secure 2.0

    The Evolution of 3D Secure Puts it at the Center of Fraud Prevention

    September 18, 2026
    fraud detection signals

    Why Fraudsters Look Trustworthy and Good Customers Look Suspicious

    September 17, 2026
    Fraud Monitoring, Nacha ACH Rules, Same Day ACH

    10 Years Running, Same Day ACH Continues to Break New Ground

    September 16, 2026
    stablecoin infrastructure

    To Unlock Stablecoins’ Potential, Infrastructure Gaps Must Be Resolved

    September 15, 2026
    Latin America payment orchestration

    Navigating Latin America’s Complex Payment Ecosystem

    September 14, 2026
    upi biometric

    Beyond Authentication: Rethinking Digital Identity Security

    September 11, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result