PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

California’s Overdraft Fee Ban Takes Effect

By Tom Nawrocki
January 3, 2025
in Analysts Coverage, Debit
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
ATMs, ATM jackpotting in the US

Close up hands using an ATM machine on a sunny day. Generative AI

California’s ban on overdraft fees at ATMs went into effect at the start of the year. Coupled with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s new rule last month limiting overdraft fees to $5, this could signal the beginning of the end for these charges.

The new California law prohibits state-regulated banks and credit unions from imposing fees when consumers attempt to withdraw money but are declined due to insufficient funds. While the federal Electronic Fund Transfer Act already prevents banks from charging overdraft fees on ATM and one-time debit card transactions unless consumers have explicitly opted in, the California law takes this a step further by completely eliminating such fees.

“Consumers receive no service at all in exchange for the fee,” said California State Senator Tim Grayson upon proposing the bill last April. “The fees themselves, which average $34, do not represent the marginal costs to institutions for declining the transaction.”

Banks in California can still charge overdraft fees in other circumstances. Starting 2026, however, credit union overdraft fees will be capped at $14, unless a lower federal limit is set.

The CFPB Pushes Forward

That lower limit may soon become a reality. The CFPB rule capping overdraft fees would apply to banks and credit unions with at least $10 billion in assets. According to the CFPB, this measure is expected to save consumers $5 billion annually in overdraft fees.

The CFPB’s overdraft rule will take effect on October 1. However, the Consumer Bankers Association has filed a lawsuit against the CFPB in Mississippi, claiming that the agency exceeded its statutory authority.

Banks argue that overdraft fees offer protection to their customers. They claim that turning all overdrafts into returned payments could result in late payment fees and potential negative impacts on credit ratings. The CFPB counters that overdraft coverage functions as a loan to the customer, akin to credit cards, and should therefore be subject to the Truth in Lending Act. This law requires the disclosure of all applicable loan costs to borrowers.

Several major U.S. banks, including Ally Bank, Capital One, and Citibank, have already eliminated overdraft fees. Although the rule applies only to larger banks, the industry recognizes that cost pressures may also extend to smaller financial institutions.

“While the rule targets institutions with more than $10 billion in assets, the realities of the marketplace mean that overdraft programs at all credit unions are endangered,” Virginia Credit Union League President/CEO Carrie Hunt said last year. “CFPB again misses the point that not all fees are abusive. They are the cost of doing business.”

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: AllyCaliforniaCapital OneCFPBCitibankDebitOverdraft Fee

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    Modernizing Payments modernizaion

    Modernizing Payments: Tackling the Toughest Tech Challenges

    March 24, 2026
    fintech bank data

    The Growing Data Battle Between Banks and Fintechs

    March 23, 2026
    7 Fabulous AI Chatbot Trends for Small Business, AI chatbots in business, chatbots instant gratification millennials

    What Banking Customers Want—and Don’t Want—From Chatbots

    March 20, 2026
    credit unions crypto

    What Should Credit Unions Be Doing with Crypto?

    March 19, 2026
    agentic commerce trust

    The Fate of Agentic Commerce Hinges on an Elusive Resource: Trust

    March 18, 2026
    fis fednow, commercial prepaid

    Where Are the Biggest Opportunities in the Commercial Prepaid Market?

    March 17, 2026
    Australia, fintech infrastructure investment

    Bridging the Gap: Investment Opportunities in Emerging Infrastructure

    March 16, 2026
    vertical saas

    Vertical SaaS Is Cashing in on Payments

    March 13, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result