PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Despite Stewart’s Shutdown, Tap-to-Pay Remains Safe for Most Consumers

By Tom Nawrocki
November 18, 2024
in Merchant, News
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on LinkedIn
CStore Decisions: Alltown and PayByCar Fuel Contactless Payment Method

Gas statCStore Decisions: Alltown and PayByCar Fuel Contactless Payment Methodion at night time

Following a series of fraudulent purchases, a convenience store chain has temporarily halted its contactless payment system. Stewart’s Shops disabled its tap-to-pay technology in mid-October. However, experts suggest the decision may be an overreaction to a software glitch, emphasizing that tap-to-pay remains a secure payment method for consumers.

According to Stewart’s, criminals used tap-to-pay to make sizable purchases, allegedly with stolen or fraudulent credit cards. Although the transactions went through as if they were legitimate, the payments ultimately failed to process.

Stewart’s operates more than 350 stores across upstate New York and Vermont, with the scams reported from stores in Ulster and Orange counties. In response, the company promptly disabled tap-to-pay functionality across all locations but is actively working to  restore the service.

According to Don Apgar, Director of Merchant Services at Javelin Strategy & Research, the issue was likely a result of something other than a weakness in tap-to-pay technology. “It is very hard to drive fraud through contactless payments given the security that is built into the interface,” he said.

Compliance Is Key

Apgar noted that, in most cases, stores are not held responsible for fraudulent transactions. Merchants bear no liability for contactless transactions as long as their systems comply with PCI-DSS security standards.

“If these fraud transactions were straight-up stolen cards, then the issuers absorb that fraud,” Apgar said. “If the cards were not stolen, but cloned or fraudulent somehow, they may have had inside knowledge to exploit some non-compliant weakness in Stewart’s contactless terminals. In that case, the merchant would be liable for the fraud if their card platform was not PCI-DSS compliant.”

And that may be the case with what happened at Stewart’s. “It’s a software bug, not a breach,” Stewart’s spokesman Robin Cooper told the Albany Times-Union. “None of our customers’ information is in jeopardy.” 

A Safer Method

In general, tap-to-pay is considered a safer alternative to inserting a card at a gas pump. The FBI has even issued a bulletin encouraging consumers to use tap-to-pay for gas and similar purchases, noting that “tap-to-pay transactions are more secure and less likely to be compromised.”

Skimming, however, remains a serious concern for retailers. This crime involves devices illegally installed on or inside ATMs, point-of-sale terminals, or fuel pumps that capture card data and record cardholders’ PINs. According to the FBI, skimming costs financial institutions and consumers more than $1 billion each year.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on LinkedIn
Tags: Card SkimmingContactless PaymentsMobile PaymentsStewart's ShopsTap to Pay

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    circle stablecoin

    As Prepaid Fraud Evolves, So Do the Rules

    September 21, 2026
    bots fraud, bank security in data sharing, J.P. Morgan fraud protection TSYS, 3D Secure 2.0

    The Evolution of 3D Secure Puts it at the Center of Fraud Prevention

    September 18, 2026
    fraud detection signals

    Why Fraudsters Look Trustworthy and Good Customers Look Suspicious

    September 17, 2026
    Fraud Monitoring, Nacha ACH Rules, Same Day ACH

    10 Years Running, Same Day ACH Continues to Break New Ground

    September 16, 2026
    stablecoin infrastructure

    To Unlock Stablecoins’ Potential, Infrastructure Gaps Must Be Resolved

    September 15, 2026
    Latin America payment orchestration

    Navigating Latin America’s Complex Payment Ecosystem

    September 14, 2026
    upi biometric

    Beyond Authentication: Rethinking Digital Identity Security

    September 11, 2026
    Fraud Monitoring, Nacha ACH Rules, Same Day ACH

    Nacha’s Upcoming Rules Refresh Is All About Improving Clarity

    September 10, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result