PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Morgan Stanley May Have Reset the Crypto Trading Fee Baseline

By Tom Nawrocki
May 7, 2026
in Analysts Coverage, Digital Assets & Crypto
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
google crypto wallet, crypto regulation

A new pricing war is emerging in crypto trading as traditional brokerages move to challenge both crypto-native platforms and retail trading apps on fees, access, and trust.

E*TRADE, owned by Morgan Stanley, has launched a pilot spot crypto trading service for Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana, charging 50 basis points (0.5%) per transaction. That undercuts rival Charles Schwab’s 75-basis-point spread on similar trades and competes directly with Robinhood, which charges spreads ranging from 35 to 95 basis points.

E*TRADE customers will initially gain access to Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana—the same three cryptocurrencies Morgan Stanley plans to offer via ETF products. The infrastructure is powered by Zerohash, which Morgan Stanley brought on as its crypto rails partner last year. The bank plans to expand access to all 8.6 million E*TRADE clients by the end of 2026.

The most notable impact comes from pricing. Combined with Morgan Stanley’s full-service brokerage offering, the move could reshape the spot crypto trading market.

“Crypto-native exchanges have historically had high fees and spreads,” said Joel Hugentobler, Cryptocurrency Analyst at Javelin Strategy & Research. “We saw the same pattern take place in equities with traditional brokerages, where the differentiation will shift towards features like the ecosystem, custody, and lending.”

Benefits of Traditional Brokerages

Large incumbents like Morgan Stanley already serve millions of clients across stocks, ETFs, retirement accounts, and cash management, giving them a built-in distribution advantage over newer, crypto-first platforms.

Morgan Stanley also tends to serve higher-net-worth clients than Robinhood’s largely retail base, and those investors often prioritize regulated, custodial-grade access to digital assets. By also undercutting Robinhood on pricing, Morgan Stanley appears increasingly well positioned to compete across both segments.

How ETFs May Respond

The addition of spot crypto trading follows Morgan Stanley’s recently introduced spot Bitcoin ETF, which has attracted $211 million in inflows since debuting last month. That product is priced competitively, with fees of just 14 basis points.

A similar fee-driven played out when Bitcoin ETFs first launched in early 2024, as issuers aggressively lowered expenses to capture market share ahead of and immediately after launch. A comparable dynamic could extend into spot trading, with brokerage platforms and ETF issuers continuing to compete on price as the market matures.

“It’s mostly separate so I don’t think it’ll impact the ETFs,” Hugentobler said. “The ETFs will still charge the management fee. Their prices may come down over time, but most of them are already pretty low.” 

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: BitcoinCharles SchwabCrypto ETFE*tradeMorgan StanleyRobinhoodSpot Trading

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    fraud passkey, passkeys

    The Passkey You Can’t Steal: Why Hardware Beats Software for High-Stakes Authentication 

    May 7, 2026
    automotive collections

    Reducing Friction in Automotive Collections

    May 6, 2026
    payment cards as customer experience

    From Hygiene Factor to Hero Product: Why the Card Deserves a Second Look

    May 5, 2026
    cobrand credit card

    Co-Branded Credit Cards Still Hold Promise for Smaller Issuers

    May 4, 2026
    Dual-rail recurring billing for agentic commerce

    Fueling Agentic Commerce with Dual-Rail Recurring Billing

    May 1, 2026
    credit union p2p

    How Should Legacy Banks Compete with Chime?

    April 30, 2026
    Prepaid cards for payroll and tipping

    Tips on a Prepaid Card: A Practical Solution with Broad Industry Impacts

    April 29, 2026
    credit-push fraud

    Inside the Battle Against Credit-Push Fraud: What’s Changing

    April 28, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result