Open Banking or a Can of Worms: Choosing Open Access Over Data Security?

business man entering data of a credit card . On-line shopping on the internet using a mobile phone

business man entering data of a credit card . On-line shopping on the internet using a mobile phone

Open Banking is a great buzzword but is it overrated?  Under PSD2, open banking is intended to bring more lending options and better competition (hence lower pricing) to consumers. Only 3 banks complied on the due date, Allied Irish Bank, Danske and Lloyds Banking Group.

Sitting in the US, it is hard to figure why Europeans do not see the potential for a security blowup.  Opening up banking systems to loosely regulated firms sounds like a recipe for disaster, at least in the large U.S. Market.

In Open Banking, we take careful, secure banks and allow third-party firms to enter the internal bank infrastructure to create unrelated banking offerings.  Sounds like the EU is adding doors that can be subject to forced entry by fraudsters.

That is one way to look at it.  Another is to let the free market prevail.  Allow alternative lenders to advertise and create sufficient internet presence so that consumers can find them.  Concurrently, lock down the system against misuse.  It is much more than just EMV; banking needs to be impenetrable and not particularly open to fraudsters.

…Just like EU Interchange regulation: poised to help consumers, but no cardholder value?

Overview by Brian Riley, Director, Credit Advisory Service at Mercator Advisory Group

Read the quoted story here

Exit mobile version