PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Ponemon/ThreatMetrix Study Looks at Concerns about Online Fraud

By Mercator Advisory Group
April 28, 2011
in Analysts Coverage
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Coins.Money icon. Internet button on white background.

Coins.Money icon. Internet button on white background.

A report released by ThreatMetrix and the Ponemon Institute says that 85 percent of the respondents in the survey think that online fraud prevention measures aren’t up to snuff. This is up from 80 percent in 2009, in the last iteration of the Ponemon study that asked the same question. Additionally, 42 percent said they had been victims of online fraud, of which only 20 percent reported the incident.

“A lot of fraudulent activity goes unreported today, making it difficult for online businesses to fully understand the prominence and seriousness of the problem,” said Reed Taussig, president and CEO, ThreatMetrix. “With a rise in online transactions and activities across devices, more needs to be done to educate online merchants, banks, social outlets and other businesses on how to decrease fraudulent activity.”

The survey respondents who expressed concern over online fraud said they felt online merchants, banks and social networks need to take additional steps to prevent fraudsters from stealing consumer information.

Nearly three in four respondents would allow a trusted online business to place an invisible cookie on their computer to automatically authenticate them, and 82% indicated that they would expect an online business to offer alternative authentication methods if they were unable to match the consumer’s digital fingerprint to their security system.

“Our survey results help validate the need and consumer preference for technology, such as device identification, to authenticate identity as opposed to using personally identifiable information,” said Dr. Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of the Ponemon Institute. “Consumers expressed much more willingness to share data like ISP, computer serial number, type and make, rather than information like date of birth and telephone number.”

Based on survey findings, consumers have a positive perception about companies that use authentication and fraud detection tools to prevent online fraud. Fifty-six percent of consumers even indicated they are ‘more willing’ to shop or browse an online business if they know that company is taking specific measures toward combating fraud. However, the majority of respondents stated a preference for companies to share information about their device for authentication purposes — as opposed to sharing personal information to verify their identity.

“Some e-tailers today are promoting ‘anti-virus’ or ‘secure transaction’ messaging online, when they should also be touting ‘anti-fraud’ messages as well,” said Taussig.

The research also looked at consumer sentiment about fraud prevention across the banking, social media and Web 2.0 industries and mobile channel. For more information about the findings, download a copy of the report at http://info.threatmetrix.com/ConsumerSurveyOnlineFraud2011.html.

Click here to read more.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    Startups: Fintechs Data Streaming Technology in Banking, corporates Enriched Data vs Faster Payments

    Fighting Fraud in the Era of Faster Payments

    February 13, 2026
    cross-border payments

    Solving for Fraud in Cross-Border Payments Requires Better Counterparty Verification

    February 12, 2026
    agentic commerce

    Demystifying the Agentic Commerce Enigma

    February 11, 2026
    payment gateways

    How Payment Gateways for Businesses Can Help You Offer Your Customers More Options

    February 10, 2026
    Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Extends Mandate for Tokenization to June '22

    Late Payments? Governments Are Taking Action

    February 9, 2026
    ai phishing

    The Fraud Epidemic Is Testing the Limits of Cybersecurity

    February 6, 2026
    stablecoins b2b payments

    Stablecoins and the Future of B2B Payments: Faster, Cheaper, Better

    February 5, 2026
    Payment Facilitator

    The Payment Facilitator Model as a Growth Strategy for ISVs

    February 4, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2024 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result