PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

When Adopting Prepaid, FI’s Must Target Low and Moderate Income Customers – Or Face the Consequences

By Tim Sloane
March 28, 2011
in Mercator Insights, Uncategorized
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Biometric Mobile Payment, virtual cards, Biometric Credit Card Technology

Biometric mobile payment concept with realistic smartphone with fingerprint login application and credit cards set vector illustration

While Mercator Advisory Group has predicted continued GPR growth driven by increased adoption by FI’s in the wake of Durbin, FI’s must recognize that adoption across too broad a user base will place them in significant jeopardy with the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Be extremely wary of any advice that argues for maximizing profitability at the expense of adhering to the very first paragraph of the legislation.

The legislative discussions that lead to the Durbin Amendment made it clear that the prepaid exemption was intended to benefit initiatives that target low and moderate income families. This becomes even more compelling when coupled to the additional fact that the very first paragraph of the amendment empowers the board to prevent circumvention or evasion.

“(1) REGULATORY AUTHORITY OVER INTERCHANGE TRANSACTION
FEES.-The Board may prescribe regulations, pursuant to section 553of title 5,
United States Code, regarding any interchange transaction fee that an issuer
may receive or charge with respect to an electronic debit transaction, to
implement this subsection (including related definitions), and to prevent
circumvention or evasion of this subsection.”

Mercator Advisory Group suggests that targeting moderate to high transactors for prepaid adoption in light of these facts would be a decidedly poor business decision. While this approach would indeed maximize interchange income, it will also put the institution inthe cross-hairs of regulators since the selection criteria will almost always select higher income individuals and families, and not the low and moderate income target that was the intent of the legislators.

Mercator Advisory Group has worked with several institutions that are evaluating prepaid as a mechanism to support turn downs and as a new entry level and low-end banking product. This will enable the institution to continue to offer “Free Banking” even as the Durbin Amendment eliminates the very profitability that enabled the “free” low-end checking accounts.

Financial institutions should consider how a new low-end checkless checking account that is based on prepaid technology can provide a viable replacement product for existing “free checking” products. Properly implemented, these new low-end product lines will fit seamlessly into the bank’s portfolio of banking products. The bank can then create fee structures on existing products that become unprofitable under Durbin that will move low balance customers to the new low-end checkless checking account that remains free.

Mercator Advisory Group trusts this approach falls in line with the legislative intent and will enable financial institutions to recover prepaid implementation costs while also enabling them to deliver high value financial services to individuals and families that are not currently able to maintain the average daily balance required to accommodate a free checking solution.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: DebitMerchant AcquiringMobile PaymentsPrepaidSelf Service and ConvenienceSocial Media

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    Tina Shirley

    From Cross-Border Payments to Community Banks: The Future of Zelle®

    February 17, 2026
    Startups: Fintechs Data Streaming Technology in Banking, corporates Enriched Data vs Faster Payments

    Fighting Fraud in the Era of Faster Payments

    February 13, 2026
    cross-border payments

    Solving for Fraud in Cross-Border Payments Requires Better Counterparty Verification

    February 12, 2026
    agentic commerce

    Demystifying the Agentic Commerce Enigma

    February 11, 2026
    payment gateways

    How Payment Gateways for Businesses Can Help You Offer Your Customers More Options

    February 10, 2026
    Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Extends Mandate for Tokenization to June '22

    Late Payments? Governments Are Taking Action

    February 9, 2026
    ai phishing

    The Fraud Epidemic Is Testing the Limits of Cybersecurity

    February 6, 2026
    stablecoins b2b payments

    Stablecoins and the Future of B2B Payments: Faster, Cheaper, Better

    February 5, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2024 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result