PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Three Reasons Why Financial Institutions Need an Offensive Security Strategy

By Luke Secrist
January 5, 2023
in Featured Content, Fraud & Security, Industry Opinions, Security
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Payments Security, offensive security strategy

Payments in 2021 and Beyond: The Final Bastion for Payments Security Is Software

In 2019, First American Financial Corporation was breached and more than 885 million financial and personal records were exposed. It was the most significant cyber attack known to date for a financial institution and the repercussions still linger to this day. Major companies such as Robinhood, IRA Financial Trust, and others have experienced breaches in the last 12 to 18 months. The list continues to grow and shows few signs of slowing down. In fact, a report from BCG indicates that financial services organizations are 300 times more likely to be the victim of a cyber attack than other organizations. How can an offensive security strategy help?

Businesses dedicate only 11% of their IT budgets to cybersecurity and the majority prioritize defensive security. Of course, a strong defense is essential to protecting the perimeter and is important for monitoring response capability and reaction time. However, most organizations mistakenly overlook offensive security. Scanning networks for vulnerabilities should be considered a priority—auditing and conducting threat simulations to check what is and isn’t fortified provides valuable insight into numerous security perspectives within an organization.

Frequently Investing in Security

The only way to know if your organization is susceptible to threats is to have professional hackers with engineering and developer backgrounds, who are apt to think like the enemy, simulate attacks. And you can’t do it as a one-off. You need to invest regularly in continuous threat simulation that encapsulates planned and unplanned attacks. Criminal hackers don’t attack based on a schedule that suits your business. “Anytime, anywhere” is their mantra, and most professional hackers can infiltrate a network within 12 hours. Continuous threat simulation is the only way to identify weaknesses, thwart entry, and combat.

Automated tools can only go so far. They can’t conduct authentic threat simulations. They can’t be creative and make decisions on the fly, like developing code or finding ways to circumvent a system. With continuous threat simulation, people are at the core of the process, not just technology. Besides, simulating real-world attacks gives you insight into an attacker’s mind, which is exceptionally valuable as you plan your overall cybersecurity strategy. 

Below are three other reasons why adopting an offensive security strategy will improve your cybersecurity posture and prevent breaches.

Provides Better ROI

Continuous threat simulation provides valuable metrics, such as trends and historical data, which allow you to see how and when your security is failing. It also allows you to understand how an attacker got in. Organizations often make the same mistakes repeatedly and by having statistical highlights, you can budget finances and resources more accurately for the right solutions your business needs with better data. It also helps to educate your staff for the future so they can think more proactively.

Evaluates People and Processes

Another advantage of continuous threat simulations is that they don’t just look at technology problems; you can also evaluate people and processes that cause unauthorized access to assets. It’s far more beneficial and less costly for a trusted team to find vulnerabilities before criminals do. After all, 95% of cyber attacks occur due to human error. 

Reduces ancillary costs

When a breach happens, your business loses money, among other things. You need to shut down systems to identify the root cause of the breach, distribute additional resources to bring systems back online, and halt access to other parts of your environment. All of these moves take time and utilize resources. This doesn’t even consider the business losses that can occur if an actual breach occurs.

Remember, continuous threat simulation is not automated penetration testing or vulnerability scanning. It’s a dedicated team of individuals who ‘ethically hack’ your fortress. Businesses should start by engaging a team to conduct a baseline test to ensure their environment is not at immediate risk. Then, they should engage them at least once a month. This approach to cybersecurity will help your organization better prepare.

Considering only two years ago, the Financial Stability Board (FSB) warned that “a major cyber incident, if not properly contained, could seriously disrupt financial systems, including critical financial infrastructure, leading to broader financial stability implications.” With cyberattacks on the rise, this warning could become a reality if institutions don’t get more proactive.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: CybersecurityFraudFraud PreventionSecurity

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    stablecoin

    Stablecoin Success Will Depend on More Than Technology

    June 2, 2026
    A man standing outdoors uses a cryptocurrency trading app on his smartphone. This represents mobile finance, freedom, and real-time investing.

    How Gamification Helps Drive Engagement in Digital Banking

    June 1, 2026
    BIS Wants Central Banks to Move Faster with CBDC amid Looming Stablecoin Pressure

    The Next Phase for Prepaid Cards Could Be Stablecoins

    May 29, 2026
    Synthetic Identities

    A Victimless Crime: Why Synthetic Identities Demand Layered Verification

    May 28, 2026

    Stablecoins Are Turning the Remittance Business Model on Its Head

    May 27, 2026
    legacy banking, instant payments

    The Instant Payments Shift Is Testing the Limits of Legacy Banking

    May 26, 2026
    innovation

    Companies No Longer Dabble in Innovation, They Prioritize It

    May 22, 2026
    klarna debit card

    Why Too Many Banks Are Losing Out on Merchant Services

    May 21, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result