PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Banks, Credit Unions File Lawsuit to Stop Illinois Swipe Fee Law

By Tom Nawrocki
August 16, 2024
in Fees, Merchant, News
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Credit Cards, swipe fees

Banking and credit union groups have filed a lawsuit against the state of Illinois, seeking to block the ban on applying interchange fees to taxes and tips. The suit claims that if the Illinois Interchange Fee Prohibition Act (IFPA) were to take effect, it would disrupt the current payment system and reduce the benefits that credit and debit cards offer to both consumers and businesses.

The law was signed on June 7 by Governor JB Pritzker and is set to take effect in July 2025, making Illinois the first state to exempt taxes and tips from interchange fees.

Challenges Arising from Illinois’ Interchange Fee Prohibition Act

Card issuers and processors would need to establish specific rules for consumers based in Illinois. The IFPA is vague about implementation details, but it could require consumers to swipe their credit card a second time to cover taxes and tips.

The lawsuit was filed by the Illinois Bankers Association, American Bankers Association, Illinois Credit Union League, and America’s Credit Unions, alleging that Illinois is interfering with the federal government’s exclusive regulatory authority over various federally chartered financial institutions. They argue that this law would prevent federal and state financial institutions from operating on a level playing field.

“The IFPA therefore cannot be enforced against national or state banks, federal or state savings associations or savings banks, federal or state credit unions, card networks, or any other participants in the electronic payment processing ecosystem that are integral to facilitating card transactions,” the suit claims.

“There is no way to implement what the law states easily or inexpensively,” said Don Apgar, Director of the Merchant Payment Practice at Javelin Strategy & Research. “It’s not just as simple as not charging the merchant fees on taxes and tips, but this affects the entire settlement process between merchants, processors, card networks and card issuers.  There is also the possibility that smaller issuers will cease servicing restaurants or allowing their cards to be used there solely to avoid the costs of compliance, reducing competition and ultimately resulting in higher costs for merchants and consumers.”  

Those in Support

Retailers remain in full-throated support of the IFPA. “It helps retailers control costs on the moneys they’re collecting on behalf of state and local governments and tipped employees,” Rob Karr, President and CEO of the Illinois Retail Merchants Association, told Bloomberg Law. Karr’s group helped the Illinois legislature write the law.

The Illinois rule is seen as a test case, with several other states now considering similar laws. Pennsylvania, for example, has proposed a law that would require processors to refund swipe fees incurred on sales taxes.

In addition, Senator Dick Durbin—who’s from Illinois—has been advocating for a national cap on interchange fees  through his Credit Card Competition Act of 2023. However, that proposal remains stalled in the Senate Banking Committee and the House Financial Services Committee.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: CreditDebitIllinoisInterchange FeesMerchantSwipe Fees

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    fraud disputes

    The Hidden Cost of Fraud Disputes Is Hitting Banks Hard

    May 13, 2026
    crypto payments

    Crypto Payments Are Ready for the Mainstream

    May 12, 2026
    payments, payment operations

    Staying Afloat as Payment Operations Rapidly Evolve

    May 11, 2026
    first-party fraud

    Inside the Growth of First-Party Fraud

    May 8, 2026
    fraud passkey, passkeys

    The Passkey You Can’t Steal: Why Hardware Beats Software for High-Stakes Authentication 

    May 7, 2026
    automotive collections

    Reducing Friction in Automotive Collections

    May 6, 2026
    payment cards as customer experience

    From Hygiene Factor to Hero Product: Why the Card Deserves a Second Look

    May 5, 2026
    cobrand credit card

    Co-Branded Credit Cards Still Hold Promise for Smaller Issuers

    May 4, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result