PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

More Seniors Are Falling Victim to Impersonation Scams

By Wesley Grant
August 11, 2025
in Elder Fraud, Featured Content, Fraud & Security
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
elder fraud

man business drinking coffee and show trading,

Over the past four years, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has observed a more than four-fold increase in the number of older adults who have lost $10,000 or more to impersonation scams.

According to the FTC, these scams generally fall into three main categories.

In the first, a bad actor poses as a representative from a well-known organization and claims there is suspicious activity on the victim’s account. In the second, a scammer impersonates a government official and informs the individual that their personal data is tied to illicit activity such as money laundering. The third type involves a criminal pretending to be from a tech company—such as Microsoft or Apple—warning the target of a supposed security issue with their device.

Although these attacks vary in form, the underlying goal is consistent: to start a conversation that can be manipulated for financial gain.

Unfortunately, these tactics are proving highly effective. The FTC reported that combined losses for the seniors who lost over $100,000 increased eight-fold in the past four years, from $55 million to $445 million.

Mimicking Common Communications

Seniors aren’t the only ones at risk—many younger consumers have also fallen victim to criminals impersonating major companies, such as Best Buy, Amazon, and PayPal. Cybercriminals not only mimic common communications from these brands, but they also now use advanced technology that makes their scams much harder to detect.

For example, a recent phishing tactic involved bad actors sending emails that appeared to come from PayPal, complete with a legitimate-looking sender address. The emails used the platform’s actual money request feature to ask for payment. The only subtle red flag? The “to:” field contained the cybercriminal’s own email address.

“The PayPal phish-free phishing attack shows just how crafty cybercriminals have become with social engineering scams,” Suzanne Sando, Senior Fraud and Security Analyst at Javelin Strategy & Research, told PaymentsJournal. “Closely following advice given to consumers from FIs, fintechs, and other major financial industry leaders allows these scammers to circumvent the usual red flags consumers are told to look for when determining the legitimacy of a transaction request.”

“Consumers are primarily the first line of defense when it comes to scams, so when everything seemingly checks out and looks legitimate, it’s an easy decision to move forward with the transaction,” she said.

Personalized Fraud Tactics

These crafted messages are effective across the board, but especially so when criminals can personalize them. With younger users, criminals often leverage social media to reach their targets.

WhatsApp recently identified and deleted 6.8 million accounts on its platform linked to scams. These scams—which also appear on Facebook and Instagram—included fake investment opportunities and offers of cash in exchange for likes.

Since seniors tend to be less social media savvy, criminals use a different tactics. Phone calls are still the most common method for targeting older adults.

In addition to the communication method, criminals also tailor their messaging to maximize impact. Older consumers are more likely to take a caller at face value rather than question their legitimacy or hang up.

“Seniors are especially vulnerable because of the socially engineered techniques cybercriminals rely upon,” Tracy Kitten, Director of Fraud and Security at Javelin Strategy & Research told PaymentsJournal. “A sense of urgency and threatening rhetoric make victims feel as if they’ve been backed into a corner.”

“It’s a tactic that is particularly effective with seniors, especially when they fear a loved one might be in danger or that they could face some kind of penalty or fine if they don’t immediately comply with the criminal’s requests,” she said.

Keeping Criminals at Bay

The growing threat against seniors is prompting many organizations to take steps to prevent elder financial abuse.

Nacha’s Payments Innovation Alliance recently issued tools designed to help vulnerable consumers and raise awareness about elder fraud. Among them is a checklist to help banks assist seniors who may have been exposed to scams.

For its part, the FTC also issued guidance for seniors. It warned them not to move money to “protect” it or for any other reason. The FTC also advised older adults to immediately stop all conversations with unknown parties and verify that the individual is from the organization they claim to represent.

Additionally, the Federal Trade Commission recommended that seniors leverage call-blocking technology to reduce the risk of contact with criminals.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: Elder FraudFTCImpersonation ScamImpostor ScamPhishingSeniors

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    Modernizing Payments modernizaion

    Modernizing Payments: Tackling the Toughest Tech Challenges

    March 24, 2026
    fintech bank data

    The Growing Data Battle Between Banks and Fintechs

    March 23, 2026
    7 Fabulous AI Chatbot Trends for Small Business, AI chatbots in business, chatbots instant gratification millennials

    What Banking Customers Want—and Don’t Want—From Chatbots

    March 20, 2026
    credit unions crypto

    What Should Credit Unions Be Doing with Crypto?

    March 19, 2026
    agentic commerce trust

    The Fate of Agentic Commerce Hinges on an Elusive Resource: Trust

    March 18, 2026
    fis fednow, commercial prepaid

    Where Are the Biggest Opportunities in the Commercial Prepaid Market?

    March 17, 2026
    Australia, fintech infrastructure investment

    Bridging the Gap: Investment Opportunities in Emerging Infrastructure

    March 16, 2026
    vertical saas

    Vertical SaaS Is Cashing in on Payments

    March 13, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result