PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Core: Don’t Toss Legacy but Do Reconfigure

By Brian Riley
July 14, 2017
in Analysts Coverage
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Acquiring Bank, core systems

Vehicles parked in front of the bank with the city as a backdrop.

 It is harder to hire a COBOL programmer for your core system in the US than one versed in XML. COBOLers went to college in the early 1970s, many are retired, others are a bit crusty and dangle cigarettes as they work their way through the environment section of COBOL code. And, according to Computer World, as of 2013, 73% of universities do not offer COBOL as a programming class. Today, it is probably 80% do not offer COBOL.

The scary part is that 71% of survey respondents believe that their businesses will rely on COBOL for core systems through 2023, according to the same study.

I used to be pretty good at COBOL way back when, because it always seemed structured enough to discipline a disorganized baby boomer. You have sections for defining the environment, setting up inputs and outputs, then link in VSAM or sequential files and away you go.

But banking has come a long way. New products, new opportunities, and new risks. Customers no longer settle for what we feed them, they have their own requirements and if you don’t meet them, you will be quickly cast aside.This is a nice article that discusses whether or not banks should “rip and replace” their software or modernize old code.

• As technology changes accelerate, banks increasingly must consider whether their core systems, which they may have had for decades and in which they have made considerable investments, can still serve their customers efficiently and economically

• “Some banks in some countries have tried to replace systems completely,” said IBM’s An. However, he said, many customers, especially in North America, have taken a different tack.

• Legacy systems, he pointed out, are really adept at transaction processing, low latency, and very high throughput, as well as having all the regulatory processes embedded.

These decisions involve billions of dollars of investments for banks who run their own platforms. From where I sit, unless you are a multinational global bank, FIS, First Data, Fiserv and TSYS offer great options that bring little risk. Each of those companies provided cloud services long before there was a “cloud”. But some banks have the competence to keep their own code inhouse for proprietary reasons, and there are plenty out there.

Overview by Brian Riley, Director, Credit Advisory Service at Mercator Advisory Group

Read the full story here

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: Banking

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    Preparing for Quantum Day and the Risks to Modern Cryptography

    June 17, 2026
    passkeys authentication

    The Post-Password Era: Rethinking Authentication in Financial Services

    June 16, 2026
    scams

    The Future of Same Day ACH, RTP, and Virtual Cards  

    June 15, 2026
    payment api

    Open Banking Has Made Payment APIs a Burgeoning Revenue Stream

    June 12, 2026
    payment card innovation

    Serving a Segment of One: The Race to Stay Top of Wallet

    June 11, 2026
    healthcare payments

    The Healthcare Payments Industry Has a Perception Problem

    June 10, 2026
    continuous KYC

    The Future of KYC Is Layered—and Data-Driven

    June 9, 2026
    tokenized deposits

    As Crypto Challengers Emerge, Banks Turn to Tokenized Deposits

    June 8, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result