PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

23% of Small Businesses Have a Tiered Pricing Transaction Fee Schedule, but They’d Prefer…

By PaymentsJournal
October 7, 2019
in Credit, Debit, Merchant, Processing, Truth In Data
0
1
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Small businesses often rely on financial services to help them manage their day-to-day operations. These services can be essential for small businesses, but they can also be very expensive. One way that small businesses can reduce their costs is by tiered pricing. Under this type of pricing, businesses are charged different fees based on their usage. For example, a small business that uses a financial service once a month may be charged a lower fee than a business that uses the same service multiple times per week.

Don’t miss another episode of Truth In Data! Click on the red bell in the lower-left corner of your screen to receive notifications as soon as the episode publishes.

23% of small businesses have a tiered pricing transaction fee schedule, but they’d prefer:

  • While 23% have tiered pricing by volume – only 13% of small businesses prefer it
  • The most popular pricing method is flat pricing (eg. 2.75%), used by 37% of market and preferred by 38%
  • 15% of small businesses would prefer ‘all in’ pricing – but only 10% of small businesses use that method
  • Interestingly, 9% of small business owners don’t know their pricing method, and 11% aren’t sure what they’d prefer
  • Two popular small business POS providers, Clover & Square, have fees ranging from 2.3% to 3.5%
  • Clover & Square will also include a flat $0.10 – $0.30 per transaction

About the report

Small businesses suffer from a lack of expertise, financial services, and capital, leading to a failure rate of close to 50% within five years of start-up, according to the U.S. Small Business Administration. However, the market has been difficult for merchant acquirers to serve, due to price sensitivity, high risk, and a high cost of sales. A new research report from Mercator Advisory Group, Square and Clover Delivering Merchant Services Beyond Payment Acceptance examines the success of Square and Clover as examples of a new approach to serving small businesses using marketplaces that provide choice and flexibility while using commodity hardware.

“Instant onboarding is the sizzle, not the steak. While digitized and fast merchant onboarding looks great, small businesses need to understand the fee schedule and the complete range of solutions and apps that directly apply to their specific operational needs and future growth,” commented Raymond Pucci, Director, Merchant Services, at Mercator Advisory Group, and author of this report.

This report is 16 pages long and has 5 exhibits.

Companies mentioned in this report: Android, Apple, Apptizer, Bank of America Merchant Services, Celtic Bank of Utah, Clover, DoorDash, First Data, Fiserv, Intuit, PayPal, Poynt, Sam’s Club, Square, and Walmart.

1
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: AndroidAppleApptizerBank of America Merchant ServicesCeltic Bank of UtahCloverDoorDashFirst DataFiservIntuitPayPalPoyntSams ClubSquareWalmart

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    agentic commerce

    Demystifying the Agentic Commerce Enigma

    February 11, 2026
    payment gateways

    How Payment Gateways for Businesses Can Help You Offer Your Customers More Options

    February 10, 2026
    Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Extends Mandate for Tokenization to June '22

    Late Payments? Governments Are Taking Action

    February 9, 2026
    ai phishing

    The Fraud Epidemic Is Testing the Limits of Cybersecurity

    February 6, 2026
    stablecoins b2b payments

    Stablecoins and the Future of B2B Payments: Faster, Cheaper, Better

    February 5, 2026
    Payment Facilitator

    The Payment Facilitator Model as a Growth Strategy for ISVs

    February 4, 2026
    Simplifying Payment Processing? Payment Orchestration Can Help , multi-acquiring merchants

    Multi-Acquiring Is the New Standard—Are Merchants Ready?

    February 3, 2026
    ACH Network, credit-push fraud, ACH payments growth

    What’s Driving the Rapid Growth in ACH Payments

    February 2, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2024 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result