PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Apple to Allow Third-Party Payments for In-App Purchases in SK

By Jordan Hirschfield
July 5, 2022
in Analysts Coverage, Digital Payments, Emerging Payments
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
In-App Purchases

In-app purchases are a type of payment system that allows users to buy digital goods or services within an app. This can include anything from premium content to extra lives in a game. In-app purchases are typically made through a credit card or other payment platform. Many developers offer in-app purchases as a way to generate additional revenue, while some apps are entirely based on this model. In-app purchases have become increasingly popular in recent years, as they offer a convenient and easy way for users to get the content they want. However, there has been some controversy surrounding in-app purchases, as some feel that they are unfair or misleading. Developers must be transparent about what is being offered for sale, and users should be aware of the potential costs before making any purchase.

Apple will now permit developers in South Korea to offer third party payment systems for in-app purchases, the first opportunity worldwide, but that opportunity doesn’t come without potential drawbacks. Nadeem Sarwar reports in Digital Trends:

“It sounds good on paper, but the road ahead for developers is far from rosy, and almost sounds like a bunch of punitive conditions for putting cracks in its walled garden. But there’s more to this forced change of heart than it appears.”

The move to allow third party payments likely will not reduce fees and in some cases will actually bring smaller developer costs to be in-line with the higher commissions for flagship developers who will only get a marginal savings in commission:

“If you are a small developer, it makes more sense to pay a 15% tax by sticking to Apple’s own payment system with the App Store Small Business Program, rather than skirt around the App Store tax and pay a higher 26% fee. For developers in South Korea, a reduction in App Store tax from 30% to 26% won’t make much of a difference, unless they play at a global scale with a massive user base.”

The small savings for flagship developers comes with additional drawbacks as consumers will be presented with messaging that payments would be made outside of Apple’s environment, relieving Apple of any responsibility for additional protection they currently support for fraud protection, indemnity, and other related services. In addition users would be required to enter payment information each time they make a purchase.

“It’s both cumbersome for the user, and an effective scare tactic, especially for users who come to Apple’s ecosystem for its safety and convenience. Such a setup poses a tangible risk of user exodus, which is something developers should be extremely concerned about. There are always rivals ready to pounce on the opportunity by offering what users seek.”

These changes represent a slight opening of Apple’s in-app payment infrastructure, one that could be repeated if legal efforts fail in the U.S. or Europe, but also give an indication of the complexity that will be presented to compensate for the additional development.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: AppleDigital PaymentsMobile AppSouth KoreaThird Party

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    Startups: Fintechs Data Streaming Technology in Banking, corporates Enriched Data vs Faster Payments

    Fighting Fraud in the Era of Faster Payments

    February 13, 2026
    cross-border payments

    Solving for Fraud in Cross-Border Payments Requires Better Counterparty Verification

    February 12, 2026
    agentic commerce

    Demystifying the Agentic Commerce Enigma

    February 11, 2026
    payment gateways

    How Payment Gateways for Businesses Can Help You Offer Your Customers More Options

    February 10, 2026
    Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Extends Mandate for Tokenization to June '22

    Late Payments? Governments Are Taking Action

    February 9, 2026
    ai phishing

    The Fraud Epidemic Is Testing the Limits of Cybersecurity

    February 6, 2026
    stablecoins b2b payments

    Stablecoins and the Future of B2B Payments: Faster, Cheaper, Better

    February 5, 2026
    Payment Facilitator

    The Payment Facilitator Model as a Growth Strategy for ISVs

    February 4, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2024 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result