PaymentsJournal
SUBSCRIBE
  • Analysts Coverage
  • Truth In Data
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Industry Opinions
  • News
  • Resources
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
  • Analysts Coverage
  • Truth In Data
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Industry Opinions
  • News
  • Resources
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Apple to Allow Third-Party Payments for In-App Purchases in SK

Jordan Hirschfield by Jordan Hirschfield
July 5, 2022
in Analysts Coverage, Digital Payments
0
Apple to Allow Third-Party Payments for In-App Purchases in SK

Apple to Allow Third-Party Payments for In-App Purchases in SK

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

In-app purchases are a type of payment system that allows users to buy digital goods or services within an app. This can include anything from premium content to extra lives in a game. In-app purchases are typically made through a credit card or other payment platform. Many developers offer in-app purchases as a way to generate additional revenue, while some apps are entirely based on this model. In-app purchases have become increasingly popular in recent years, as they offer a convenient and easy way for users to get the content they want. However, there has been some controversy surrounding in-app purchases, as some feel that they are unfair or misleading. Developers must be transparent about what is being offered for sale, and users should be aware of the potential costs before making any purchase.

Apple will now permit developers in South Korea to offer third party payment systems for in-app purchases, the first opportunity worldwide, but that opportunity doesn’t come without potential drawbacks. Nadeem Sarwar reports in Digital Trends:

“It sounds good on paper, but the road ahead for developers is far from rosy, and almost sounds like a bunch of punitive conditions for putting cracks in its walled garden. But there’s more to this forced change of heart than it appears.”

The move to allow third party payments likely will not reduce fees and in some cases will actually bring smaller developer costs to be in-line with the higher commissions for flagship developers who will only get a marginal savings in commission:

“If you are a small developer, it makes more sense to pay a 15% tax by sticking to Apple’s own payment system with the App Store Small Business Program, rather than skirt around the App Store tax and pay a higher 26% fee. For developers in South Korea, a reduction in App Store tax from 30% to 26% won’t make much of a difference, unless they play at a global scale with a massive user base.”

The small savings for flagship developers comes with additional drawbacks as consumers will be presented with messaging that payments would be made outside of Apple’s environment, relieving Apple of any responsibility for additional protection they currently support for fraud protection, indemnity, and other related services. In addition users would be required to enter payment information each time they make a purchase.

“It’s both cumbersome for the user, and an effective scare tactic, especially for users who come to Apple’s ecosystem for its safety and convenience. Such a setup poses a tangible risk of user exodus, which is something developers should be extremely concerned about. There are always rivals ready to pounce on the opportunity by offering what users seek.”

These changes represent a slight opening of Apple’s in-app payment infrastructure, one that could be repeated if legal efforts fail in the U.S. or Europe, but also give an indication of the complexity that will be presented to compensate for the additional development.

Tags: AppleapplicationsDigital PaymentsMobile AppSouth KoreaThird Party
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

    Analyst Coverage, Payments Data, and News Delivered Daily

    Sign up for the PaymentsJournal Newsletter to get exclusive insight and data from Mercator Advisory Group analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    digital payments

    Navigating the Future: Top Digital Payment Trends to Watch

    March 31, 2023
    scams

    As Scams Become Omnipresent, New Tools Can Help FIs Fight Back

    March 30, 2023
    item clearing

    As Check Volumes Decrease, Financial Institutions Need to Consider Alternative Clearing Options

    March 29, 2023
    payments friction

    Too Much Payments Friction Can Lead to Customer Chafing

    March 28, 2023
    online fraud

    Understanding the Cost of Online Fraud and How to Prevent It

    March 27, 2023
    live shopping, ebay

    Q&A: eBay Exec on Live Shopping and the Future of Payments

    March 24, 2023
    AI and Biometrics in Regulatory Compliance in Finance

    The Importance of AI and Biometrics in Regulatory Compliance in Finance

    March 23, 2023
    Everyone Benefits from the Real-Time Payment Networks  

    Everyone Benefits from the Real-Time Payment Networks  

    March 22, 2023

    Linkedin-in Twitter

    Advertise With Us | About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Subscribe
    ©2023 PaymentsJournal.com

    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    Menu
    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Industry Opinions
    • Recent News
    • Resources
    Menu
    • Industry Opinions
    • Recent News
    • Resources
    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Industry Opinions
    • Faster Payments
    • News
    • Jobs
    • Events
    No Result
    View All Result