Bank overdraft fees can generate significant revenue for financial institutions, but they can also create lasting consequences for customer relationships. Younger consumers appear particularly vulnerable, with many frequent overdraft users falling in their late teens through early 30s and relying heavily on debit cards for everyday purchases.
For banks and credit unions, the issue extends beyond the immediate revenue generated by overdraft charges. Customers who repeatedly incur fees may come to view their financial institution as contributing to their financial difficulties, potentially damaging trust at a stage when younger consumers are beginning to establish long-term banking relationships.
Younger adults are among those hardest hit by bank overdraft fees, a new report from the Pew Charitable Trusts that was released on Wednesday said.
More than a third of “heavy” overdraft users — those who pay $100 or more in bank fees in a year for overdrawing their bank accounts — are in their late teens through early 30s, Pew found.
One reason younger consumers may be more affected is that they are more likely to use debit cards, and debits make up the majority of transactions resulting in overdraft fees, said Joy Hackenbracht, a research officer with Pew.
“Frequent overdrafts are a financial burden,” she said.Many banks let customers overspend their checking accounts when they do not have enough money to cover a purchase, but then charge a fee — typically $35 — known as an overdraft fee.
A small proportion of customers pay the majority of overdraft fees, Pew found, and they pay more than three such fees a year. The typical debit transaction amount that results in an overdraft fee is $24.
While fee income may be welcome by some financial institutions, they can cause irreparable harm to their reputations. This is because fees, particularly those that appear to take advantage of customers’ and members’ short-term money woes, can be a death knell for future relationship-building efforts. As noted in this article, many of these cases involve younger consumers, many of whom will soon be advancing in their financial lives, and will be looking for a primary financial institution. For FIs charging exorbitant fees, they must realize that they are trading shorter-term revenues for lost opportunities down the road.
The concentration of bank overdraft fees among a relatively small group of customers presents financial institutions with an important strategic question. While overdraft programs can provide short-term fee income, repeatedly charging customers who are already struggling to maintain sufficient account balances could undermine the broader value of those relationships.
This is particularly important when the customers affected are younger adults. Consumers in their late teens, 20s, and early 30s may currently have relatively modest balances and limited financial needs, but their value to a financial institution can increase substantially as they progress through different stages of their financial lives. Over time, they may need mortgages, auto loans, credit cards, investment products, and other financial services.
An overdraft fee resulting from a relatively small debit card purchase could therefore have consequences well beyond the immediate transaction. A customer who believes a bank or credit union treated them unfairly during a period of financial difficulty may be less inclined to deepen that relationship later.
Financial institutions should consider bank overdraft fees within the context of long-term customer value rather than evaluating them solely as a source of fee income. Helping customers manage short-term financial difficulties while maintaining trust could ultimately prove more valuable than maximizing revenue from overdrafts.
Overview by Ed O’Brian, Director, Banking Channels Advisory Service at Mercator Advisory Group
Read the full story here
