PaymentsJournal
SUBSCRIBE
  • Analysts Coverage
  • Truth In Data
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Industry Opinions
  • News
  • Resources
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
  • Analysts Coverage
  • Truth In Data
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Industry Opinions
  • News
  • Resources
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Battle Lines Being Drawn For Individual Privacy Online

Patricia McGinnis by Patricia McGinnis
December 20, 2010
in Uncategorized
0
Mobile banking
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Every day, it seems, we learn ofanother marketer’s innovation enabling Web-based firms to track ourevery move.What products are we researching?What are we buying?Whatgames are we playing?What online payment methods do we use?If we’retracked by GPS or phone signal, where are we?Which merchants wantto know we are there?Yes, it’s getting scary out there forindividuals.Despite the fact that the largest web-based firms allprofess to protect the privacy of users, somehow the enforcementhas failed in multiple instances.

Recent press suggests that therisks continue to grow.An October 10 article in the New YorkTimes raises the prospect of increased exposure for individualswhen HTML 5 begins to be adopted.(“New Web Code Draws Concern OverPrivacy Risks,” by Tanzina Vega)Although this next version of theweb -coding language reportedly incorporates many features thatwill make life easier for users, it also greatly expands thecapability for collection and storage on the user’s own harddrive of substantial amounts of personal information andweb-activity history, under the control of (and accessible by)network third parties rather than the user himself.Yikes!

Battle lines are being drawn, andtroops being rallied, by both sides of the privacy debate. OnDecember 1, the Federal Trade Commission released a new reportcalling for increased regulation of data access and protection ofprivacy rights online.The report suggests a national “do not trackonline” opt-out mechanism, similar to the “do not call” registrythat already limits telephone solicitation, but implemented locallyby a setting on the user’s internet-enabled device.In the USCongress on December 2, the House Subcommittee on Commerce, Tradeand Consumer Protection held hearings on the issue. In thatcontext, Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal (who hasbeen elected to join the next Congress) submitted testimony aboutthe “deeply disturbing and disquieting” practice of web-basedentities collecting and utilizing data on individuals without theirknowledge.Other legislators have also indicated their intentions toinitiate or support more consumer protection in this space.Clearly,the momentum is building to enact some sort of legislated privacyright.

Where is the opposition?Alsorallying its forces.Privately-owned Facebook has been a target ofmuch criticism in the past year for its sometimes callous and/orindifferent attitude to the privacy rights of its users.It hasattempted to refresh its image with new privacy-managementcapabilities introduced in 2010, but many Facebook users find thetools difficult to manage.Furthermore, Facebook has been forced toacknowledge that numerous of its developer-partners have violatedits rules with respect to third party use of the data associatedwith specific individuals.Facebook has not been blind to the risksthat privacy protectionists present to its business model.Accordingto a recent Bloomberg News report by Sara Forden, Facebook’sWashington office, launched with one junior staffer in 2007, hasexpanded to six, including some recently-hired, high profilelobbyists.They are currently recruiting for two more relativelysenior Washington positions.

Facebook is not the only vendorwhose business model is vulnerable to privacy regulations, but italmost certainly has the deepest pockets.There is no doubt thatmany of their partners, as well as unrelated innovative startups,will ultimately be induced to enter the fray. The debate is justbeginning; it should make for interesting politics in 2011.

Tags: Banking ChannelsDebitMercator InsightsMerchant AcquiringMobile PaymentsPrepaidSocial Media
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

    Analyst Coverage, Payments Data, and News Delivered Daily

    Sign up for the PaymentsJournal Newsletter to get exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    Digital Wallet Use Delivers on Convenience and Security

    Digital Wallet Use Delivers on Convenience and Security

    May 30, 2023
    5 Ways to Protect Your Financial Institution from a Cyberattack

    5 Ways to Protect Your Financial Institution from a Cyberattack

    May 26, 2023
    traditional banks

    How Traditional Banks Can Modernize Without Risk

    May 25, 2023
    identity fraud

    Javelin’s Identity Fraud Study Highlights the Changing Nature of Fraud

    May 24, 2023
    SASE, security-as-a-service

    Security-as-a-Service Secures
    Distributed IT Models

    May 23, 2023
    mule. real-time

    Early Detection of Mule Activity Requires Real-Time Solutions

    May 22, 2023
    embedded finance, ecommerce

    How Retailers Can Enter the World of Embedded Finance Confidently 

    May 19, 2023
    cross-border

    Cross-Border Trade is a Cinch with the Right Payments Partner

    May 18, 2023

    Linkedin-in Twitter

    Advertise With Us | About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Subscribe
    ©2023 PaymentsJournal.com

    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    Menu
    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Industry Opinions
    • Recent News
    • Resources
    Menu
    • Industry Opinions
    • Recent News
    • Resources
    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Industry Opinions
    • Faster Payments
    • News
    • Jobs
    • Events
    No Result
    View All Result

      Register to download this complimentary report from Brightwell: