The digital assets industry has achieved milestones at breakneck speed in its rise to mainstream prominence over the past few years. While the recent approval of Coinbase’s trust bank application may appear to be just another milestone, it has drawn pushback from the traditional banking sector.
The Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) went so far as to call the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s (OCC) conditional approval of Coinbase’s application “a grave mistake.”
At the heart of the ICBA’s concerns is the possibility that Coinbase could gain access to the federal banking system without bearing the same regulatory burdens as traditional banks. Because Coinbase wouldn’t be subject to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) requirements, the group also questioned what would happen to customer assets in the event of the company’s failure.
For its part, Coinbase emphasized in a blog post that it has no intention of becoming a commercial bank. The firm stated it will neither accept retail deposits nor engage in fractional reserve banking. Instead, it aims to use the trust bank charter to bring federal oversight to its crypto custody and market infrastructure operations.
Not an Unprecedented Move
As a leader in the digital assets industry, Coinbase’s approval is significant—but not unprecedented. Circle, Ripple, Paxos, and Bridge have all received conditional trust bank approvals in recent months.
However, these firms are more focused on stablecoins and therefore fall under the oversight framework established by the GENIUS Act, which governs U.S. stablecoin issuers. Their trust bank charters allow them to issue stablecoins, hold digital assets, and manage reserves under federal supervision.
Seeking Universal Rules
As a crypto custodian, Coinbase could also become subject to the CLARITY Act if it is enacted. The bill, which targets non-stablecoin cryptocurrencies, has already passed the House of Representatives but has stalled in the Senate—largely due to opposition from Coinbase over restrictions related to tokenized equities.
Despite the pause in the CLARITY Act’s progress, Coinbase has reiterated its longstanding support for comprehensive digital asset regulation—a position widely shared across the crypto industry, in part to address lingering misconceptions about the sector.
“There was a perception for a period of time that the larger field of crypto was kind of like the wild, wild west,” James Wester, Director of Cryptocurrency and Co-Head of Payments at Javelin Strategy & Research, said in a recent PaymentsJournal podcast. “Yet, there have been companies over the last many years that saw the value of crypto, digital assets, stablecoins, blockchain, and tokenized assets—and were begging for regulatory clarity. They were saying that there’s an efficiency gain here; there are cost reductions.”
“What’s so surprising is how willing and able companies in the space were to say, ‘Now that there’s clarity, we’re happy to look at compliance; we are happy to look at regulation; we are happy to look at governance—because we were always willing to do that,” he said.
