PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Credit Card Merchant Fee Dispute

By Raymond Pucci
January 9, 2017
in Analysts Coverage
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
blockchain

Happy man giving bank card to smiling female waiter in restaurant

What’s in a word? A lot. At least that’s the crux of a case currently before the U.S. Supreme Court. According to the following report, the case pits a group of merchants vs. New York State, over the use of the word “surcharge.” At issue is freedom of speech related to how merchants choose to describe the higher fee they charge to offset a credit card’s payment transaction swipe fee.

If you pay a different price for a haircut using a credit card rather than cash, what is that price called? It may seem like splitting hairs, but it’s an important free speech matter in front of the Supreme Court on Tuesday.

The commercial speech case of Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman hasn’t gotten a lot of headlines, but it has drawn the attention of an eclectic group of scholars and experts debating the difference between two words.

The case involves the constitutionality of laws in New York and nine other states that allow merchants to charge higher prices to customers who pay with a credit card rather than with cash. The merchants do so to recoup money paid to credit card companies who charge swipe fees for a credit-card transaction.

Merchants such as Expressions are barred from using the word “surcharge” when informing customers about the price difference. Instead, the word “discount” must be used in New York when referring to a cash payment. And under New York law, merchants who use the word “surcharge” in these scenarios face a fine and up to one year in jail for their choice of nouns. Joining Expressions in the case are other merchants, including Brooklyn Farmacy & Soda Fountain Company, Five Point Academy and Patio.com.

The question in front of the Court is this: “Do state no-surcharge laws unconstitutionally restrict speech conveying price information or do they regulate economic conduct?” The Court considered the case in private conference on September 26 and granted it for arguments just three days later. Undoubtedly helping the case get its court date were two other federal court rulings on the same matter.

The Expressions ruling was made by the Second Circuit Appeals Court. A district court had ruled in favor of Expressions, which wanted to use the word “surcharge” posted on a sign as a more effective way of getting customers to pay cash. The Second Circuit Appeals Court overturned the lower court ruling, saying the state law regulated prices, and not speech, and it wasn’t subject to a higher level of legal scrutiny required in free speech cases.

Call it what you will—surcharge, discount, payment card transaction fee—but this is a cost of doing business for merchants, and the amount should be disclosed to their customers. Then let the customer decide their choice of payment. Don’t some gas stations keep it simple and transparent by listing the two prices (credit and cash) side-by-side at the pump? Different merchants have their own display methods and simple signage may not be workable. But try this—just disclose both prices and the descriptive words will not matter.

Overview by Raymond Pucci, Associate Director, Research Services at Mercator Advisory Group

Read the full story here

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    recurring payments, PCI Compliance for small business, Fintech for Underserved Small Businesses

    Tariffs May Create an Opportunity in Small-Business Cards

    May 15, 2025
    Using the Card “Beyond” Payments to find the Holy Grail

    Using the Card “Beyond” Payments to find the Holy Grail

    May 14, 2025
    Payments Modernization

    Playing Offense and Defense: Why Now Is the Time for Payments Modernization

    May 13, 2025
    Authorization Rates

    Boosting Revenue for Merchants by Optimizing Authorization Rates

    May 12, 2025
    Why Payment Orchestration is the key to international merchant growth

    Ensuring Payment Decisions Pay for Themselves

    May 9, 2025
    cross-border

    As Businesses Reevaluate Cross-Border Relationships, Financial Institutions Can Help

    May 8, 2025
    Nacha WEB Debit Account Validation Rule Verification Solution, Quovo ACH Payment

    The Brave New Future of the Disappearing Account

    May 7, 2025
    solana financial

    After an Upgrade, Solana is Primed to Be the Blockchain of Choice for Financial Institutions

    May 6, 2025

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2024 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result