PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Fraud: Banks Pay a Price for COVID-19 Relief Checks 

By Sophia Gonzalez
November 8, 2022
in Analysts Coverage, Fraud & Security
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Fraud prevention management

Mercator research examined the surge of fraud amidst the pandemic. It identified three major areas: low traffic industries (travel and lodging), secure message portals, and eCommerce-based transactions. According to the Federal Trade Commission, there was an estimated $5.8 billion worth of consumer fraud in the U.S. for 2021. But the fraud does not stop there. The US Department of Labor’s Office of the Inspector General estimates an additional $45.6 billion worth of fraud from unemployment checks.  

Quick Fraud Controls Were Too Aggressive According to CFPB 

Where the blame for fraud management is a bone of contention. 

Bank of America was hit with a $225 million fine for its responsibility of the situation in July 2022. Following suit, U.S. Bank recently disclosed a securities filing on Tuesday. This has prompted the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to start an investigation.  

A variety of relief programs under the CARES Act were fraught with fraud. But according to a recent action Bank of America may have been too aggressive in trying to curtail fraud. According to Payments Dive: 

  • The OIG found “historic levels of improper payments” regarding the distribution of the unemployment-related benefits in four states in 2020. 
  • An estimated $30.4 billion of the $71.7 billion in pandemic unemployment programs issued in four states during a six month period that year were paid improperly (42.4%), while an estimated $9.9 billion of that was paid to fraudsters (13.8%), the report found. 

Bank of America was found to be too aggressive in its fraud mitigation efforts. 

  • In the case of Bank of America, the Charlotte, North Carolina-based firm’s effort to tamp down fraud went too far, according to the CFPB. 
  • “Bank of America automatically and unlawfully froze people’s accounts with a faulty fraud detection program, and then gave them little recourse when there was, in fact, no fraud,” the CFPB, which handed the bank a $100 million fine, said in a statement in July. 

Fraud Management: What Did They Do? 

Big banks, such as Bank of America and U.S. Bank, partnered with the federal government to distribute unemployment checks to struggling Americans. They had good intentions. But they also distributed unemployment checks tied to Social Security numbers of people who filed in multiple states. Some were federal prisoners, who were deceased and who used suspicious email accounts in their claims. Fraudsters caught onto the new unemployment programs that were being rolled out so quickly and took advantage of the vulnerability aspect to these innovative programs. In retrospect, those new programs should have incorporated bulletproof fraud prevention.   

When attempting to rectify this gross mishandling of money, the situation got worse. The very people who the big banks were seeking to help got the short end of the stick.  

It is not yet confirmed if the CFPB’s investigation of U.S. Bank is related to fraud management efforts, but we expect an update in the coming weeks.  

Overview by Sophia Gonzalez, Research Analyst, Debit Advisory Service at Mercator Advisory Group.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: CFPBFraudFraud DetectionFraud ManagementFraud MitigationFraud Prevention

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    continuous KYC

    The Future of KYC Is Layered—and Data-Driven

    June 9, 2026
    tokenized deposits

    As Crypto Challengers Emerge, Banks Turn to Tokenized Deposits

    June 8, 2026
    physical digital debit

    Whether Physical or Digital, Debit Cards Are a Payments Mainstay

    June 5, 2026
    agentic commerce

    Separating Hype from Reality in Emerging Payment Trends

    June 4, 2026
    agentic commerce

    Searching for Trust in Agentic Commerce

    June 3, 2026
    stablecoin

    Stablecoin Success Will Depend on More Than Technology

    June 2, 2026
    A man standing outdoors uses a cryptocurrency trading app on his smartphone. This represents mobile finance, freedom, and real-time investing.

    How Gamification Helps Drive Engagement in Digital Banking

    June 1, 2026
    BIS Wants Central Banks to Move Faster with CBDC amid Looming Stablecoin Pressure

    The Next Phase for Prepaid Cards Could Be Stablecoins

    May 29, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result