PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

How Financial Scams Are Impacting Different U.S. States

By Josh Einis
August 14, 2023
in Analysts Coverage, Fraud & Security
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Scam A New Frontier of Fraud: Synthetic Identity Fraud

A New Frontier of Fraud: Synthetic Identity Fraud

From sophisticated AI deepfakes to phishing attacks cloaked in emails and text messages, criminals worldwide are increasingly stealing personal information to scam victims. Certain states in the U.S. are actually more susceptible, based on reporting from Forbes.

Earlier this year, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released its most recent data and revealed that consumers reported losing roughly $8.8 billion in 2022 because of scams—that’s an increase of 30% from a year prior. Forbes combed through the stats and analyzed it a step further, identifying the states where scams are most prominent.

Georgia came out on top, “with 437 fraud reports for every 100,000 residents during the first quarter of 2023,” while South Dakota reported experiencing fewer financial scams compared to other states. Forbes also found that imposter scams—which are the most common—are most likely to occur in Vermont.

The prevalence of imposter scams underscores the growing threat posed by deepfake technology and social engineering techniques. As the use of generative AI grows, so will the efforts of scammers—particularly as the technology is quick and cheap to use. Understanding the FTC data will be important for state governments to assess why some states are more vulnerable to scams, while others are less so.

In addition to analyzing how scams are impacting U.S. states, Forbes also dug into how they affect different age groups and ethnicities. For example, Americans ages 60 to 69 are more likely to be susceptible to fraud scams. According to the FTC, that specific age group experienced losses of $234 million in Q1 2023. In contrast, younger consumers reported losses totaling $10 million.

“Identity fraud affects different demographics in varying ways,” said Tracy Kitten, Director of Fraud & Security at Javelin Strategy & Research, who has been tracking identity fraud within the U.S. annually over the past two decades. “Non-white U.S. identity fraud victims, as an example, experience different levels of fraud. Exposure to data breaches affects 27% of Hispanic households and 26% of Black households—a considerable difference from White households.”

Ethnic groups respond differently to fraud as well.

“When actual losses occur, Black households seek remedies to their victimization by taking actions that include account closure (21%). Hispanic households follow closely behind, with 14% opting to close their accounts,” Kitten said.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: ACH fraudAdapted Fraud SchemesBank FraudFinancial Crime

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    Startups: Fintechs Data Streaming Technology in Banking, corporates Enriched Data vs Faster Payments

    Fighting Fraud in the Era of Faster Payments

    February 13, 2026
    cross-border payments

    Solving for Fraud in Cross-Border Payments Requires Better Counterparty Verification

    February 12, 2026
    agentic commerce

    Demystifying the Agentic Commerce Enigma

    February 11, 2026
    payment gateways

    How Payment Gateways for Businesses Can Help You Offer Your Customers More Options

    February 10, 2026
    Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Extends Mandate for Tokenization to June '22

    Late Payments? Governments Are Taking Action

    February 9, 2026
    ai phishing

    The Fraud Epidemic Is Testing the Limits of Cybersecurity

    February 6, 2026
    stablecoins b2b payments

    Stablecoins and the Future of B2B Payments: Faster, Cheaper, Better

    February 5, 2026
    Payment Facilitator

    The Payment Facilitator Model as a Growth Strategy for ISVs

    February 4, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2024 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result