PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

InComm’s Consumer Pulse: Retail Return Policies Command Significant Influence Over Consumer Purchasing Decisions

More than half of U.S. consumers will share a negative return experience with their personal network or publicly through online outlets; cite concerns sharing personal identification

By PaymentsJournal
October 21, 2019
in Customer Experience, Merchant, Press Releases
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
InComm’s Consumer Pulse: Retail Return Policies Command Significant Influence Over Consumer Purchasing Decisions

InComm’s Consumer Pulse: Retail Return Policies Command Significant Influence Over Consumer Purchasing Decisions

Product returns have become a central factor in purchasing decisions as 96 percent of U.S. consumers say that merchant return policies influence their shopping decisions, according to a new report released today by leading payments technology company InComm. The report, titled “Consumer Pulse: Returns,” captured current consumer preferences, opinions, and concerns surrounding the returns ecosystem.

InComm’s Consumer Pulse also found that even one poor return experience for a consumer can cause a ripple effect for retailers. As reported, more than half (53 percent) of consumers who had a negative return experience in the past went on to share that experience with friends and family or online through social media and consumer websites.

“These findings emphasize that even after a positive shopping experience, the return experience is equally important when courting and retaining loyal customers,” said Karl Denzer, Senior Vice President of Emerging Technologies at InComm. “Merchants must create a return experience that is quick and reliable, without exposing their operations to a greater risk of return fraud.”

The Good, the Bad, and Data Privacy

Consumers also weighed in on what makes or breaks the returns experience. When returning an item in-store, 57 percent of consumers cited ease and speed of the return as the factors most impacting the quality of their experience. Furthermore, more than half of consumers (56 percent) expressed concern with presenting personal identification to a retailer when processing a return.

“Retailers will have to rethink whether they should require personal identification in their return policies, especially as states like California enact privacy laws that make it more difficult to do so,” said Denzer. “Rather than relying on monitoring customer information, merchants should consider leveraging anonymous product tracking technology within their point-of-sale systems. This approach would help ensure compliance with privacy laws, such as those in California, while also facilitating a faster, more reliable return experience that reduces fraud.”

Additional findings from the report include:

  • 63 percent of consumers prefer to return an item at a brick-and-mortar store, while only 23 percent prefer to ship an item back.
  • 77 percent of consumers prefer to receive a monetary refund when they make a return (cash, debit card, or credit card refund).
  • Among consumers who were recently denied a return, the most common reasons for denial were not having the receipt or exceeding the retailer’s timeframe for a return.

InComm’s “Consumer Pulse: Returns” report drew on responses from more than 500 U.S. consumers who were asked about their experiences and attitudes towards retail return policies.

To view the complete report, click here.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: Consumer BehaviorIncomm

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    card program

    Should Banks Compete in the Credit Builder Card Market?

    January 22, 2026
    real-time payments, instant payments

    Getting Out in Front of Instant Payments—Before It’s Too Late

    January 21, 2026
    PhotonPay ClearBank

    PhotonPay Expands UK Local Payment Rails via New Collaboration with ClearBank

    January 20, 2026
    agentic commerce

    To Forecast Agentic Commerce Adoption, Look to Biometrics and Digital IDs

    January 16, 2026
    ar ap

    Where Financial Institutions Fit in the AR/AP Value Chain

    January 15, 2026
    digital gift card

    Present and Accounted For: Digital Gift Cards in Incentive Programs

    January 14, 2026
    payments fraud, faster payments fraud

    Faster Payments Demand Faster Fraud Detection

    January 13, 2026
    metal credit card

    Defying Expectations: How a Metal Credit Card Found Its Market

    January 12, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2024 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result