PaymentsJournal
SUBSCRIBE
  • Analysts Coverage
  • Truth In Data
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Industry Opinions
  • News
  • Resources
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
  • Analysts Coverage
  • Truth In Data
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Industry Opinions
  • News
  • Resources
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Interactive Map: eCommerce Fraud & Shopping Trends by US County

Yarden Altshull by Yarden Altshull
July 30, 2018
in Industry Opinions
0
Security

Security

3
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Data is essential to every aspect of managing an online business, and eCommerce fraud prevention is no exception. Without in-depth analysis, it’s of very little value. In Riskified we decided to dig into our data, as we often do, looking to find insights into fraud patterns and shopping trends, and created the following interactive map. It’s based on data from over 20 million online purchases that were shipped to a US address in 2017. The data is broken down by county and color coded according to risk of fraud.

Hovering over each county reveals the share of mobile purchases and international orders (by IP and/or credit card BIN). We encourage you to explore the map and dive into the data. You can enlarge your screen and zoom in to access smaller counties.

Risk and The City

People tend to think that crowded cities are more likely to host fraudsters than rural towns, figuring an area with an abundance of eCommerce activity, IP and shipping addresses would make for a better hiding place. We found a statistically significant correlation between population sizes and rates of eCommerce fraud. Rural counties with small populations tend to have little or no fraud, while population heavy counties typically have higher rates of fraud. But population size shouldn’t be weighed heavily when trying to predict fraud rates, as there are many contributing factors.

Counties with the highest risk of fraud

County Population
Liberty, Florida 8,365
Douglas, Nevada 46,997
McLean, Kentucky 9,531
Prince George, Virginia 35,725
Carroll, Iowa 20,816
Kings, New York 2,648,77
Ohio, Indiana 6,128
Multnomah, Oregon 735,334
Claiborne, Mississippi 9,604
New Castle, Delaware  538,479

 

Even in some of the most populous US counties – Los Angeles, Cook (Chicago), Harris (Houston), Maricopa (Phoenix) and San Diego – more than 98% of online purchases were legitimate. Meanwhile, the most fraud-prone US counties in 2017 varied greatly in terms of population. They included highly populated areas like Kings County (aka Brooklyn), but also counties with a population much lower than the 100,000 average, like Douglas County, Nevada, Kentucky’s McLean County and Indiana’s least populated county, Ohio County.

When fraudsters base their operations in small, less populated counties, their fraud attempts skew the county’s overall fraud rates. Liberty County, Florida (population 8,365) is a prime example. It topped the list with the highest rate of fraud in 2017, after an international mobile fraud ring used a local shipping address as the destination for goods they planned to steal. With a population of 113 and a fraud rate 4 times the national median, Loving County, Texas is another testament to the fact that rurality isn’t a guarantee for safety.

One factor that contributes to higher rates of fraud in certain counties is the presence of reshippers. We noticed higher-than-average fraud rates in several counties in Oregon, Delaware and Florida – all with a relatively high number of reshippers. And while the abuse of reshippers by fraudsters is well documented, it’s important to remember there are many legitimate reasons to use reshippers.

Spending Power vs. Average Purchase Value

Most people would expect to see higher cart values in more affluent counties. It simply makes sense that consumers in areas with a high median household income would spend more per eCommerce purchase. But actually, we found no such correlation.

In fact, we found that higher than average purchase values are prevalent in rural counties, perhaps because eCommerce is a convenient alternative to in-store shopping when brick & mortar locations are few and far between.

Counties with highest average cart value

County Average Cart Value
Lincoln, Maine $689
Cumberland, Maine $311
Albany. Wyoming $302
Jefferson, Washington $275
Jefferson, Alabama $257
Teton, Wyoming $251
Johnson, Iowa $246
Alcona, Michigan $228
San Miguel, Colorado $226
Green Lake, Wisconsin $223

 

Lincoln and Cumberland Counties, Maine and Albany County in Wyoming had the highest average online purchase value in 2017. Combined, they had an average cart value seven times higher than the average US county ($59).


Cross-border eCommerce

Next, we set to see which counties had a higher share of international orders. In the context of this map, this includes orders made using a foreign credit card or placed from a device with a foreign IP address or made with an international credit card, and then shipped to a US address. We expected to find the highest rate of international activity in counties with many reshippers and in cities frequented by global tourists.

Counties with highest rate of international orders

County International orders
Pembina, North Dakota 52.8%
Cook, Minnesota 37.7%
Whatcom, Washington 32%
Toole, Minnesota 27.2%
Multnomah, Oregon 26.3%
New Castle, Delaware 26.1%
Bergen, New Jersey 20.6%
Divide, North Dakota 19.5%
Kittson, Minnesota 17.1%
Douglas, Nevada 16.8%

 

Indeed, several counties in Oregon and Delaware reflected the presence of reshippers. But more interesting was the fact that many of the counties with the highest rates of international eCommerce border Canada. This finding can be easily explained  – 90 percent of Canadians live within 100 miles of the US border. Rather than pay for international shipping (and taxes) – they opt to ship their orders to a nearby US address and enjoy free shipping and returns. Over 50% of order shipping to Pembina County, North Dakota, for example, were cross-border purchases – a rate 96 times higher than the average US county. 

Mobile Usage

We also wanted to check where mobile devices were more prevalent for online orders, to see whether they were more commonly used by metropolitan and tech savvy shoppers, or more by rural shoppers where mobile devices were the primary connection to the internet.

 

Counties with highest rate of mobile orders

Jefferson, Mississippi 45.8%
Dunn, North Dakota 45.3%
Forest, Pennsylvania 41.3%
Chicot, Arkansas 41.1%
East Carroll Parish, Louisiana 39.7%
Madison Parish, Louisiana 39.1%
Crockett, Texas 38.8%
Holmes, Mississippi 38.2%
Foster, North Dakota 38%
Prince George, Virginia 37.7%

 

We found a clear correlation between ruralily and mobile usage. Whether a lack of infrastructure for physical internet lines – the average population of the 10 counties with the highest rate of mobile usage is 862.

We hope you find this interactive map interesting and useful. If you liked this map you may want to check out our previous installation – our interactive world map, which offers an overview of approval rates by country, as well industry-specific shopping patterns across the globe.

Tags: fraudPersonal DataSecurity
3
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

    Analyst Coverage, Payments Data, and News Delivered Daily

    Sign up for the PaymentsJournal Newsletter to get exclusive insight and data from Mercator Advisory Group analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    Everyone Benefits from the Real-Time Payment Networks  

    Everyone Benefits from the Real-Time Payment Networks  

    March 22, 2023
    commercial payments

    Optimizing Commercial Payments in the Digital Age

    March 21, 2023
    cross-border payments

    Cross-Border Payments: Fighting
    E-Commerce Fraud Using Data

    March 20, 2023
    fraud, ChatGPT-4

    How to Fight Fraud While Still Enabling a Great Online Customer Experience

    March 17, 2023
    RTP

    Financial Institutions Without an RTP Strategy Risk Being Left Behind

    March 16, 2023
    visa chargeback

    New Visa Chargeback Guidelines Will Be a Game Changer

    March 15, 2023
    liquidity management

    Liquidity Management Takes on Increasing Importance in Uncertain Economic Times

    March 14, 2023
    payments

    Key Challenges from Growing Payment Methods and Volume

    March 13, 2023

    Linkedin-in Twitter

    Advertise With Us | About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Subscribe
    ©2023 PaymentsJournal.com

    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    Menu
    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Industry Opinions
    • Recent News
    • Resources
    Menu
    • Industry Opinions
    • Recent News
    • Resources
    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Industry Opinions
    • Faster Payments
    • News
    • Jobs
    • Events
    No Result
    View All Result

      Register to download the Ekata complimentary report: