PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

N.C. Banks Can Freeze Some Payments for 30 Days

By Tom Nawrocki
July 8, 2026
in Analysts Coverage, Fraud & Security
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on LinkedIn
commercial card, Allpay ClearBank Prepaid Payments, wealth transfer

Banks in North Carolina now have expanded authority to delay certain customer transactions if they suspect financial exploitation. The new law is intended to prevent fraud, but some worry it could also delay legitimate payments.

The law allows banks and credit unions to refuse or pause transfers and withdrawals from the accounts of older adults and people with disabilities for up to 30 days. Financial can make the determination based on information gained during an interaction with the customer.

Before delaying or denying a transaction, financial institution must train employees and adopt policies governing how the law is applied. They are also required to maintain records for five years to help identify and track patterns of long-term financial exploitation.

Concerns Around Overreach

The law has raised concerns that banks could have too much authority over customers’ financial transactions. Greensboro news station WFMY reported that some people expressed concern on social media that they could be unable to pay bills on time if their bank froze access to their funds for 30 days. Adding to those concerns, the law shields financial institutions from lawsuits as long as they acted in good faith.

“The decision to hold payments based on suspected fraud requires case-by-case judgments from the FI staff, so staff training needs to be frequent and standardized to ensure consistency in application of payment holds,” said Suzanne Sando, Lead Analyst of Fraud Management at Javelin Strategy & Research. “What stuck out to me is the requirement for five years of record-keeping. Access to this level of data could be instrumental in highlighting patterns in suspicious activity or exploitation that might otherwise have been lost in the shuffle.”

Laws in Other States

Georgia passed a similar law that gives financial institutions less leeway over how long payments can be delayed. Under Georgia’s law, a hold on a transaction generally expires after 15 business days.

“I can see this becoming a larger trend,” Sando said. “Elder and vulnerable adult fraud is a serious problem, and these holds are a solid tool in managing this kind of fraud. It’s important for financial institutions to be transparent and consistent in application of holds to protect vulnerable customers without disrupting business as usual.”

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on LinkedIn
Tags: Bank AccountsBank FraudElder FraudFraud PreventionGeorgiaNorth Carolina

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    tap-to-pay

    Tap-to-Pay Gives Small Merchants a Big Advantage

    July 14, 2026
    cyber resilience

    Modern Cyber Risk Is Breaking Longstanding Security Assumptions

    July 13, 2026
    Merchants Real-Time Payments, swipe fees, BNPL

    How Software Turned Payments Into a Seamless Part of Commerce

    July 10, 2026
    credit union data, credit union technology

    Inside the Tech Shift Redefining How Credit Unions Operate

    July 9, 2026
    embedded payments

    What Embedded Payments Can Solve for Small Businesses

    July 8, 2026
    apple tap to pay

    Build Momentum Behind Zelle for Business

    July 7, 2026
    Accredited Payments Risk Professional

    The Growing Importance of Payments Risk Expertise

    July 6, 2026
    account aggregation

    The Dilemma Facing Financial Institutions: Aggregate or Be Aggregated

    July 2, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result