PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Plaid Agrees to Pay JPMorgan Chase Fees to Access Data

By Wesley Grant
September 16, 2025
in Emerging Payments, Fintech, News, Open Banking
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on LinkedIn
plaid jpmc

Satisfied smiling businessman in suit signing contract at meeting concept, investor or entrepreneur putting written signature on business document making good partnership deal, taking loan insurance

In a deal that could have far-reaching ramifications for the U.S. financial service industry, Plaid will pay JPMorgan Chase (JPMC) fees to access consumers’ banking data.

Plaid’s aggregation platform connects banks and their customers with third-party services, ranging from peer-to-peer payments and credit score monitoring to crypto trading.

Until now, fintech companies have had unfettered access to banks’ customer data. That will change for Plaid under its updated agreement with JPMC, which establishes a pricing structure for data access and sets clear guidelines for how both parties will protect consumer information.

A Foregone Conclusion

This shift in the financial services paradigm seemed almost inevitable after JPMorgan Chase recently highlighted the increasing number of API requests it receives from fintechs.

JP Morgan Chase reported receiving 1.89 billion requests in a single month, most of them from aggregators. Only a small fraction of these requests were initiated by customers; the rest came from fintechs pulling data for various purposes, including improving their products and marketing.

In addition to the strain on banks’ systems caused by the flood of API calls, JPMorgan Chase has also raised concerns about how some fintechs exploit consumer data. The company noted that opening access to fintechs not only creates potential privacy issues but also exposes banks to increased fraud risks.

The Insights into Why

There has been substantial resistance to both JPMC’s stance on fintechs and its decision to charge fees. The current system—which represents a shift toward the open banking model—has been built on free access to information. Charging fintechs fees could severely hinder many smaller companies’ ability to innovate and compete, potentially leading to greater centralization in the financial services industry.

In an email to PaymentsJournal, Plaid offered insights into why it agreed to pay fees to JPMC. One of the main reasons was continuity—the deal will cement the firm’s long-standing relationship with JPMC and ensure that all of Plaid’s services remain available to the bank’s customers.

While Plaid didn’t provide specifics regarding pricing, it confirmed that there will be no changes to current contracts or pricing as a result of this agreement, and customers won’t face additional fees at this time.

Finally, Plaid emphasized that it still believes consumers deserve the right to freely access and share their own information with whomever they choose. It noted that it will continue advocating for a regulatory framework to be created under Section 1033, even though that rule faces significant challenges.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on LinkedIn
Tags: ChaseFintechJPMCJPMorgan ChaseOpen BankingPlaid

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    circle stablecoin

    As Prepaid Fraud Evolves, So Do the Rules

    September 21, 2026
    bots fraud, bank security in data sharing, J.P. Morgan fraud protection TSYS, 3D Secure 2.0

    The Evolution of 3D Secure Puts it at the Center of Fraud Prevention

    September 18, 2026
    fraud detection signals

    Why Fraudsters Look Trustworthy and Good Customers Look Suspicious

    September 17, 2026
    Fraud Monitoring, Nacha ACH Rules, Same Day ACH

    10 Years Running, Same Day ACH Continues to Break New Ground

    September 16, 2026
    stablecoin infrastructure

    To Unlock Stablecoins’ Potential, Infrastructure Gaps Must Be Resolved

    September 15, 2026
    Latin America payment orchestration

    Navigating Latin America’s Complex Payment Ecosystem

    September 14, 2026
    upi biometric

    Beyond Authentication: Rethinking Digital Identity Security

    September 11, 2026
    Fraud Monitoring, Nacha ACH Rules, Same Day ACH

    Nacha’s Upcoming Rules Refresh Is All About Improving Clarity

    September 10, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result