PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Preventing Manipulation in Cryptocurrency Derivatives

By PaymentsJournal
October 30, 2017
in Industry Opinions
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Crypto Bitcoin

Both Crypto Trading Volume and Bitcoin Price Take a Dive

Cryptocurrency derivatives boast daily trading volumes that regularly exceed $1 billion in notional value. As the attention around bitcoin, Ethereum, and other digital assets continues to rise, so does the need to manage the risk associated with futures and options. The high volatility of these markets often leads to suspicious price action, leaving many traders to wonder if the markets are being manipulated.

In order to address these concerns, it is essential to create a cryptocurrency derivatives exchange that focuses on two prominent tools: a comprehensive, robust index that properly represents the broader span of the underlying spot market, and dynamic trading bands that reject order executions outside of a certain range from the index.

In order to create the most efficient leveraged Ether futures contract of ETH/USD, using Ether as collateral, one must develop a fair settlement price. In order to achieve this, an index that considers the spot markets of the leading high-volume exchanges must be created. The ETH/USD index should represent the median price of the five largest volume spot exchanges as components. The median is far more robust against volume-weighted indexes and is thus able to absorb volatile swings in single outliers.

In addition, there must always be sufficient spot component inputs to ensure that any one exchange does not have excessive influence. This addresses the issue that many crypto traders have with futures exchanges that use either a simple average or an index that contains too few inputs.

To ensure that price manipulation is not feasible, an exchange can only permit trading within a dynamic trading band around the index price. For example, a futures contract that expires within a week would not trade in a range outside of, for example, 1% above and below the index. This prevents large traders from trying to push up the price, nor engage in accommodation trading during low liquidity.

The comprehensive index and dynamic trading band represent an effort to address a common grievance among traders: that futures prices are not closely enough connected to spot prices. Additionally, the bulk of regulations created by governments to ensure fair markets are focused on price integrity. The Leverj index and dynamic trading band are designed to meet high-quality of standards seen even in legacy markets. When a system ensures that price cannot move without explanation in swings that would subsequently trigger liquidation of trader positions, then only real market moves will affect the derivative mark price.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: Cryptocurrencies

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    vertical saas

    Vertical SaaS Is Cashing in on Payments

    March 13, 2026
    tariffs

    A Year of Tariffs: Looking Back at the Global Impact

    March 12, 2026
    crypto gateway

    Crypto Gateways Offer Access at an Inflection Point for Digital Assets

    March 11, 2026
    tokenization

    Tokenization: From Security Tool to Future-Ready Payments

    March 10, 2026
    SMB banks

    Despite Fintech Encroachment, Banks Can Remain the Go-To for SMBs

    March 9, 2026
    retirement investing

    Young Customers May Not Prioritize Retirement Investing, But Banks Should

    March 6, 2026
    payment fraud

    From Reaction to Prevention: Rethinking Payment Fraud

    March 5, 2026
    first-party-fraud

    Returns, Disputes, and the Rise of First-Party Fraud

    March 4, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result