PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Samsung Technology Offers Consumers The Best Payment Solution; Is That Enough?

By Tim Sloane
March 2, 2015
in Analysts Coverage
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Samsung announced the Galaxy 6 and Loop Pay payments on March 1st. The new Loop Pay solution uses Magnetic Secure Transmission (MST) and represents a major improvement over the current Loop Pay FOB which Mercator analyzed in the blog entitled “Several Challenges Confront Samsung in Gaining Momentum with LoopPay.” The FOB was not only shrunk to fit inside the new Galaxy 6 it was also updated to support both tokenization via the mag head and full NFC support. Perhaps most interesting is the fact the device will detect if NFC is available and use that as the preferred payment mechanism and only default to the mag head if NFC is unavailable.

As a result the Samsung device will be capable of supporting 90% of merchant locations including all merchants that support NFC, a clear and large advantage over Google Wallet and Apple Pay. But that may be insufficient for market success. Continue Reading Full Blog News Item by Tim Sloane, VP of Payment Innovation, Mercator Advisory Group.

We begin this analysis by reviewing and updating the analysis that was conducted in the earlier blog entitled “Several Challenges Confront Samsung in Gaining Momentum with LoopPay” that was predicated on the Loop Pay FOB feature set. In that blog we stated:

“Apple clearly achieved a marketing coup when banks all took out ads communicating the benefits of Apple Pay, not only to their customers but to the larger market as well. It is unclear what business arrangements Samsung will put in place (if any) to encourage bank participation, much less banks’ advertising investment. In theory LoopPay enables Samsung to ignore the banks, but if Samsung does that, then it is likely to also lose banks’ marketing participation. This problem is a Samsung business and contractual consideration that only Samsung can answer, but failing to address it would be a major failure on Samsung’s part.”


Marketing and consumer attention indeed remain the key issues that may prevent broad adoption of what is clearly a better payment product for consumers. Google has achieved a partnership with mobile carriers through the acquisition of Softcard and the carriers in turn have agreed to preload Google Wallet onto compatible devices. It is rumored that Samsung has annoyed the mobile carriers by deploying a solution that bypasses carrier control of the Secure Element and has failed to provide any incentives for bank participation. Marketing and gaining consumer awareness of the Loop Pay solution may be the largest stumbling block to success. Mercator is also unaware of any announced date for the initial provisioning of Loop Pay. As will be discussed later the Loop Pay solution does not utilize the Secure Element and so may need to go through a protracted certification process.

The second issue that was discussed was the question of how Samsung would monetize Loop Pay. It has been rumored that banks have refused to offer any basis points on transactions back to Google or Samsung, so if a monetization plan is possible, it will likely be through consumer adoption of new features within the wallet, not from the banks or networks……Continued

Continue Reading Tim Sloane’s Full Blog on this topic.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    tokenization

    Tokenization: From Security Tool to Future-Ready Payments

    March 10, 2026
    SMB banks

    Despite Fintech Encroachment, Banks Can Remain the Go-To for SMBs

    March 9, 2026
    retirement investing

    Young Customers May Not Prioritize Retirement Investing, But Banks Should

    March 6, 2026
    payment fraud

    From Reaction to Prevention: Rethinking Payment Fraud

    March 5, 2026
    first-party-fraud

    Returns, Disputes, and the Rise of First-Party Fraud

    March 4, 2026
    commercial payments

    From Theory to Application: The Impending Transformation of Commercial Payments

    March 3, 2026
    Payments Modernization, ACH payments

    ACH and the Path Toward Future-Ready Payments

    March 2, 2026
    millennial gen z business owner

    Gen Z and Millennials Are Business Owners: Are Banks Ready?

    February 27, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result