PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Skirting Russian Sanctions with China’s CIPS? Not So Fast

By Steve Murphy
March 15, 2022
in Analysts Coverage, Commercial Payments, Cross-border Payments
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Skirting Russian Sanctions with China's CIPS? Not So Fast

Skirting Russian Sanctions with China's CIPS? Not So Fast

This piece posted in Bloomberg is somewhat of a reprise of one we saw a couple of weeks ago in another online posting. We commented upon that one, which was focusing on a CBDC as a way to get around sanctions. In today’s article, the focus is on China’s CIPS (Cross-Border Interbank Payment Systems) as the potential vehicle to achieve the same end. The staff author provides some detail on the scope and relevance of CIPS.

‘The Cross-Border Interbank Payment System was set up in October 2015 as a settlement and payment clearing system for transactions that use the yuan, also known as the renminbi, or “people’s currency.” The system is supervised by China’s central bank but is run by CIPS Co. Ltd in Shanghai. Ownership is spread among dozens of shareholders including state-owned Chinese financial institutions, exchanges and Western banks. Its use has steadily increased, with an average daily transaction value of 388.8 billion yuan ($61.3 billion) as of February, about a 50% increase from a year ago, according to data from the company.’

The piece goes on to explain how often the banks using CIPS are also using SWIFT as the messaging standard, since many non-Chinese institutions have not installed translators for CIPS clearing. In fact, the PBOS and SWIFT have some additional deals for network services and data storage, so in some sense are partnering more than competing, at least at this stage. Then the piece goes on to discuss relative size differences between CIPS and SWIFT (which is a messaging system only for these purposes, although SWIFT offers value-added services as well). So the real question is whether (if desired) CIPS could be used to circumvent sanctions with Russia.

‘It would only work if the transactions are in renminbi — likely only when Russia and China are settling direct trades — and both parties were CIPS members. Such payments remain small: They increased to around 6% of transactions in 2020, compared to 2% in 2013. In reality, even as the two countries have sought to move away from using the dollar in trade, that’s meant largely switching over the euro — which is also now sanctioned. And there are other issues: 

 • It’s unclear to what extent non-Chinese importers or exporters that do business with Russia would be willing to accept payment in renminbi.

 • For CIPS to be of any help to Russia in skirting the U.S. financial system, Russia would have to be part of a renminbi-centric financial system. That seems unlikely given China’s capital controls on its currency, which restrict the flow of funds in and out of the country.’

Overview by Steve Murphy, Director, Commercial and Enterprise Payments Advisory Service at Mercator Advisory Group

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: ChinaCross-BorderCross-Border PaymentsFinancial MessagingRussiaSwift

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    small business credit card

    What Banks Get Wrong About Small Business Credit Cards

    April 1, 2026
    embedded payments

    Embedding Payments for Growth: How ISVs Can Scale Through Vertical Focus and Partnerships

    March 31, 2026
    ACH fraud monitoring

    From a Checkbox to a Differentiator: Redefining ACH Fraud Monitoring

    March 30, 2026
    Digitization and Multi-Brand Cards: Prepaid Trends. Bancorp Bank prepaid card fees, Bitpay Prepaid Card, mobile prepaid debit cards, prepaid cards for councils

    Turning a Prepaid Card into a Long-Term Relationship

    March 27, 2026
    payments fraud, faster payments fraud, financial fraud

    The Emotional Toll of Financial Fraud

    March 26, 2026
    hyperliquid

    What Hyperliquid Reveals About the Future of Trading

    March 25, 2026
    Modernizing Payments modernizaion

    Modernizing Payments: Tackling the Toughest Tech Challenges

    March 24, 2026
    fintech bank data

    The Growing Data Battle Between Banks and Fintechs

    March 23, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result