PaymentsJournal
SUBSCRIBE
  • Analysts Coverage
  • Truth In Data
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Industry Opinions
  • News
  • Resources
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
  • Analysts Coverage
  • Truth In Data
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Industry Opinions
  • News
  • Resources
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Solving the Chargeback Triangle

Matthew Katz by Matthew Katz
September 12, 2018
in Chargebacks, Industry Opinions
0
chargeback

chargeback

2
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

We are now past the half-way mark of 2018 – a time of year you might think merchants can be less concerned with handling disputes and chargebacks than during the holidays and the weeks that follow when their dispute rates tend to spike. The reality is that merchants are impacted by transaction disputes and the adverse effects of chargebacks all year ‘round.

Verifi recently commissioned a report titled “The Chargeback Triangle,” which examined the effects of payment disputes and chargebacks experienced by each participant in a transaction – consumer, merchant, and issuer. In all, it’s estimated that chargebacks amounted to $31 billion in financial losses in the U.S. in 2017.

The origins of chargebacks are fairly well known. Many stem from vague descriptors on a  consumer’s billing statement, making the transaction unrecognizable. Sometimes the descriptor is simply an unfamiliar merchant name, such as the parent company of the business where the transaction occurred. With billing statement in hand or already on their card-issuing bank’s online portal, many confused consumers contact their bank to inquire about the charge – and dispute it then and there. In fact, the research discovered consumers contact their issuing bank up to 76% of the time for certain types of disputes, entirely bypassing merchants and foregoing their ability to resolve the matter before it escalates.

Many consumers have also become savvy about how easy it is to dispute a charge by “gaming the system” to avoid paying for goods and services they purchased. By asserting to their bank that they never received the item, or didn’t make the purchase at all, consumers benefit from this type of “digital shoplifting” or “friendly fraud” when their bank issues a chargeback and reverses the charge. Mission accomplished by the misleading consumer.

Then, of course, there is true fraud – the nightmares that come from stolen credit cards, account takeover, and data breaches.

Without collaboration between merchants, issuers, and consumers, everyone pays the price from a protracted and outdated dispute process.

In the chargeback battle, the research discovered merchants bear nearly $19 billion of the costs from unnecessary fees, lost merchandise, sales, and profits. Consumers generally hold merchants responsible for the problems they experience with a transaction. The report found that consumers tend to reduce purchase behavior with a merchant by as much as 62% following a chargeback. Even worse, nearly two-thirds of consumers are more cautious about patronizing merchants like the one with which the dispute occurred.

Issuers are impacted too, as the report found they incur an estimated $12 billion in losses from disputes and chargebacks. As the consumer’s first point of contact in many cases, issuers have little recourse but to extend a provisional refund, even if the chargeback is frivolous or found to be friendly fraud. Issuers are largely motivated to keep consumers happy, as they must fulfill the regulatory responsibility to protect consumer rights. As a result, issuers suffer increased costs due to write-offs and added operational expenses.

Without understanding the long-term implications of chargebacks, consumers are ultimately impacted in the form of higher prices. What’s especially eye-opening is the report found that chargebacks can be prevented more than 80% of the time when the consumer simply contacts the merchant first.

Given the overall costs and consumer dissatisfaction associated with chargebacks, merchants and issuers must make prevention a year-round priority.

Some tips to help combat the growing chargeback problem from the research findings include:

  • Support information-sharing and collaboration between all three parties to streamline the dispute process.
  • Issuers should direct consumers with non-fraud disputes directly to merchants, rather than immediately processing the chargeback.
  • Merchants should engage consumers with disputes as an opportunity to improve customer service and brand value.
  • Issuers and merchants should proactively keep consumers informed of their dispute status without requiring constant phone interaction.
  • Issuers and merchants should better track the rate at which individual consumers dispute transactions to help reduce “friendly fraud.”

Given the current state of the chargeback process, it is easy to understand why merchants and issuers might feel resigned to their fate. When merchants, issuers, and consumers collaborate and form a “Chargeback Triangle” of cooperation, they can significantly reduce the number of chargebacks and their far-reaching costs.

Tags: Chargeback
2
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

    Analyst Coverage, Payments Data, and News Delivered Daily

    Sign up for the PaymentsJournal Newsletter to get exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    open-banking Data-Sharing as a Solution to Cash Flow Issues standa

    Disjointed Open-Banking System in U.S. Leaves Opening for Permissioned Data Providers

    September 29, 2023
    FedNow

    FedNow Could Mean a Renaissance for Smaller Financial Institutions

    September 28, 2023
    Best Merchant Practices for Dealing with Supply Chain Disruption

    Nearly Half of Merchant Data is Probably Wrong. Here’s Why it Matters.

    September 27, 2023
    Mitigation of P2P Fraud Begins with Education

    Mitigation of P2P Fraud Begins with Education

    September 26, 2023
    digital payments

    Mass A2A Payment Adoption in The U.S. Contingent on Compelling USP

    September 25, 2023
    cashless payments mobile

    The Synergy Between Cashless Payments and Seamless Mobile Coverage

    September 22, 2023
    The Power of AI and How its Transforming the Financial Landscape

    The Power of AI and How It’s Transforming the Financial Landscape

    September 21, 2023
    “You’re a Fintech, I’m a Legacy Bank – How Can We Collaborate?”

    Investing in Fintech: Opportunities and Challenges in the Payments Industry

    September 20, 2023

    Linkedin-in Twitter

    Advertise With Us | About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Subscribe
    ©2023 PaymentsJournal.com

    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    Menu
    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Industry Opinions
    • Recent News
    • Resources
    Menu
    • Industry Opinions
    • Recent News
    • Resources
    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Industry Opinions
    • Faster Payments
    • News
    • Jobs
    • Events
    No Result
    View All Result