PaymentsJournal
SUBSCRIBE
  • Analysts Coverage
  • Truth In Data
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Industry Opinions
  • News
  • Resources
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
  • Analysts Coverage
  • Truth In Data
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Industry Opinions
  • News
  • Resources
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Some Countries Would Benefit By Going Cashless, But People Would Suffer

Ben Jackson by Ben Jackson
June 1, 2016
in Analysts Coverage
0
Consumers Cash ATM c-stores

Has Consumers' Use of Cash Increased or Decreased over the Last 12 Months?

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

A report in the Harvard Business Review lays out the countries that would profit most from going cashless, but it does note that there could be drawbacks for individuals.

Policy makers and economists, such as Harvard’s Ken Rogoff, have made elegant arguments for the benefits of a cashless society. Economic uncertainty around the globe has raised concerns that consumers could take cash out of banks – especially in negative interest rate envrionments — and hoard it. Eliminating cash is one way to reduce that risk. Denmark, Sweden, and Norway are already considering it, while the European Central Bank is considering getting rid of large-denomination bills.

For people facing events like natural or economic disasters, cash can provide a safety net that other forms of payments cannot. Eliminating an option for consumers is not necessarily the basis of sound policy.

The article uses measures for the cost to banks for operating ATMs, the costs of getting cash for consumers – including transport to get cash and ATM fees – and a ‘tax gap’ of money lost by taxing authorities to determine which countries would benefit from getting rid of cash. The assumptions leave room for interpretation, however.

First, cash is not only received from ATMs. While bank branches might push up the costs of cash, the ability to receive cash for wages or private sales is a huge cost savings for individuals. The informal economy would be dealt a serious blow and individuals’ costs would rise if they needed to rely on a third-party payments infrastructure for every payment. While P-to-P products are free to the consumer at this point, once electronic payments are the only way to pay, the prices of these services will rise, if for no other reason than to maintain the electronic infrastructure.

The tax gap is another assumption that needs to be considered carefully. While some informal work and transactions lead to lost revenue for the government, there is a question of the macroeconomic benefits of this activity. Depending on the source of the tax revenues, the money in the informal economy will eventually enter the formal economy again. If the government can see every time a kid gets paid for mowing his neighbor’s lawn and takes a cut, it may put the brakes on economic activity that would otherwise benefit society as a whole.

Overview by Ben Jackson, Director, Prepaid Advisory Service at Mercator Advisory Group

Read the full story here

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

    Analyst Coverage, Payments Data, and News Delivered Daily

    Sign up for the PaymentsJournal Newsletter to get exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    5 Ways to Protect Your Financial Institution from a Cyberattack

    5 Ways to Protect Your Financial Institution from a Cyberattack

    May 26, 2023
    traditional banks

    How Traditional Banks Can Modernize Without Risk

    May 25, 2023
    identity fraud

    Javelin’s Identity Fraud Study Highlights the Changing Nature of Fraud

    May 24, 2023
    SASE, security-as-a-service

    Security-as-a-Service Secures
    Distributed IT Models

    May 23, 2023
    mule. real-time

    Early Detection of Mule Activity Requires Real-Time Solutions

    May 22, 2023
    embedded finance, ecommerce

    How Retailers Can Enter the World of Embedded Finance Confidently 

    May 19, 2023
    cross-border

    Cross-Border Trade is a Cinch with the Right Payments Partner

    May 18, 2023
    debit

    5 Reasons Merchants See Debit As
    Top-of-Mind for In-Store Sales

    May 17, 2023

    Linkedin-in Twitter

    Advertise With Us | About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Subscribe
    ©2023 PaymentsJournal.com

    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    Menu
    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Industry Opinions
    • Recent News
    • Resources
    Menu
    • Industry Opinions
    • Recent News
    • Resources
    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Industry Opinions
    • Faster Payments
    • News
    • Jobs
    • Events
    No Result
    View All Result