PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Supreme Court Rejects Petition, Dealing Merchants Another Defeat on Debit Cards

By Ron Mazursky
January 22, 2015
in Analysts Coverage
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on LinkedIn
Big Data: Bridging Consumer Experience & Increased Revenues in Financial Services - PaymentsJournal

Online banking icon. Internet button on white background.

On January 20, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court announced thatthey had rejected the request from a merchant group to have the Court hear itsarguments against Federal Reserve rules that regulate interchange and the dualnon-affiliated EFT network routing requirement. This decision leaves a lower Appeals Court decision intact – keeping theFederal Reserve’s rules in place.

The merchant group, comprised of the National RetailFederation (NRF), NACS, Miller Oil, Boscov’s Department Store LLC, the FoodMarketing Institute, and the National Restaurant Association, were disappointedby the decision. The NRF said it willcontinue its efforts to reduce excessive debit card pricing.

“The court’s decision isdisappointing because it leaves merchants and their customers paying far morethan intended by Congress,” Mallory Duncan, senior vice president and generalcounsel at the NRF, said in a statement. “The court’s ruling means retailerswill keep paying billions of dollars more than they should and that fee-hungrybanks will continue to rake in unearned profits that ultimately come out ofconsumers’ pockets. We will continue to press the issue.”

On the other side of the fight, the American BankersAssociation applauded the U.S. Supreme Court and repeated their claim that themerchants are keeping the savings from the Federal Reserve cap resulting fromthe Durbin Amendment.

“The Supreme Court has reached theright result today, but we shouldn’t lose sight of the fact that the underlyingpolicy–the Durbin Amendment– has not accomplished its goal of lowering pricesfor consumers,” the banking trade group said in a statement. “At theend of the day, American consumers have paid the price for the efforts ofbig-box retailers to line their pockets at their own customers’ expense.”

The likelihood of the U.S. Supreme Court hearing this appealwas almost non-existent since only 1% of such petitions for U.S. Supreme Courtreview are granted.

This seems to put the debit pricing and routing requirementsarguments to rest, at least for the time being.


Overview by Ron Mazursky, Director, Debit Advisory Service for Mercator Advisory Group

Read full story in Digital Transactions

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on LinkedIn

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    cyber resilience

    Modern Cyber Risk Is Breaking Longstanding Security Assumptions

    July 13, 2026
    Merchants Real-Time Payments, swipe fees, BNPL

    How Software Turned Payments Into a Seamless Part of Commerce

    July 10, 2026
    credit union data, credit union technology

    Inside the Tech Shift Redefining How Credit Unions Operate

    July 9, 2026
    embedded payments

    What Embedded Payments Can Solve for Small Businesses

    July 8, 2026
    apple tap to pay

    Build Momentum Behind Zelle for Business

    July 7, 2026
    Accredited Payments Risk Professional

    The Growing Importance of Payments Risk Expertise

    July 6, 2026
    account aggregation

    The Dilemma Facing Financial Institutions: Aggregate or Be Aggregated

    July 2, 2026
    contactless payments

    Wherever There’s Friction, Contactless Payments Can Help

    July 1, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result