PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Transport for London Makes Capital's Buses Cash-Free

By Nikhil Joseph
July 14, 2014
in Analysts Coverage
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on LinkedIn
calculator and stationery items on the table

calculator and stationery items on the table

Despite the promises that it would be an anonymous currency, Bitcoin is not beyond the reach of the long arm of the law. The Drug Enforcement Agency announced that it has seized Bitcoins from a suspected drug dealer and deposited them into its own account, according to letstalkbitcoin.com:

The Drug Enforcement Administration posted an Official Notification that Bitcoin (i.e. property) belonging to Eric Daniel Hughes was seized for forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881, because the property was used or acquired as a result of a violation of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. §§ 801 et seq.)

DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

13-DEA-581051, 11.02 Bitcoins, Acct.#1ETDwGUC1QcjYuehFr3u1FD3MvDaUs7SFy,

VL: $814.22 which was seized in Charleston, SC from Eric Daniel Hughes AKA Casey Jones on April 12, 2013

TechCrunch points out that the DEA’s action shows that law enforcement agencies are more tech savvy than some criminals may be giving them credit for:

What is fascinating is that the DEA has already moved to cover all of the cryptocurrency bases. They they have their own account to where the 11.02 BTC was moved is one thing. However, that they discovered Hughes’ stash is entirely another. It suggests that the DEA, in the case, was aware of the Silk Road and Hughes’ activities – he was described in some postings as being an incautious drug salesperson – and that the sting went down online rather than, as they say, in real life.

Click here read more from TechCrunch.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on LinkedIn

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    cyber resilience

    Modern Cyber Risk Is Breaking Longstanding Security Assumptions

    July 13, 2026
    Merchants Real-Time Payments, swipe fees, BNPL

    How Software Turned Payments Into a Seamless Part of Commerce

    July 10, 2026
    credit union data, credit union technology

    Inside the Tech Shift Redefining How Credit Unions Operate

    July 9, 2026
    embedded payments

    What Embedded Payments Can Solve for Small Businesses

    July 8, 2026
    apple tap to pay

    Build Momentum Behind Zelle for Business

    July 7, 2026
    Accredited Payments Risk Professional

    The Growing Importance of Payments Risk Expertise

    July 6, 2026
    account aggregation

    The Dilemma Facing Financial Institutions: Aggregate or Be Aggregated

    July 2, 2026
    contactless payments

    Wherever There’s Friction, Contactless Payments Can Help

    July 1, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result