PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Where Is the Apple Payment and Crypto Suit Headed?

By Tom Nawrocki
November 22, 2023
in Analysts Coverage, Cryptocurrency, Digital Assets & Crypto
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on LinkedIn
Is Apple Pay “Open” or Tilted to Favor Apple as EU Suspects?

Is Apple Pay “Open” or Tilted to Favor Apple as EU Suspects?

Apple is facing a new class-action lawsuit by users of Venmo and CashApp, who claim that Apple conspired to limit peer-to-peer (P2P) payment options on its devices, and specifically limited crypto payment solutions. According to the complaint, Apple’s agreements limit “feature competition” within P2P payment apps, including prohibiting existing or new platforms from using “decentralized cryptocurrency technology.” As a result, users have reduced access to various payment vehicles, which means artificially increased prices when they go to send money or trade cryptocurrencies.

“These agreements limit feature competition—and the price competition that would flow from it—marketwide, including by barring the incorporation of decentralized cryptocurrency technology within existing or new iOS peer-to-peer payment apps,” the complaint said.

What the Suit Is Seeking

The lawsuit seeks an injunction that, if successful, could force Apple to divest or segregate its Apple Cash business. The lawsuit also claims that Apple has excluded at least two Bitcoin wallet apps, Zeus and Damus, from its App Store. The plaintiffs hope to force Apple to permit the usage of the crypto wallets that have heretofore been unavailable.

The complaint was filed by the users of Venmo and Cash App on November 17 in a California District Court. Apple has entered into anti-competitive agreements with both those payment platforms. Significantly, the lawsuit did not include PayPal, the owner of Venmo, or Block, the owner of CashApp. Apparently, the plaintiffs feel that Venmo and CashApp were coerced into this arrangement.

The lawsuit also accused Apple of forcing any new P2P apps for its devices to exclude any potential crypto functionality. The plaintiffs allege that in its restraints, Apple forced new payment apps to prohibit crypto trading “as a condition for entry.”

Increased Scrutiny for Payment Apps

This all comes against the backdrop of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s proposal earlier this month to regulate all payment apps and digital wallets—including Apple Pay, CashApp, and Venmo—just as it would any other financial institution. Under the proposal, all “general purpose digital consumer payment applications” would be subject to the same compliance rules as banking institutions and credit card companies. Apple and its partners would likely prefer to avoid that.

There seems to be little chance of the lawsuit against Apple succeeding. And Apple has recently been working to further integrate Venmo into its functionality. But in the interest of deterring further scrutiny and regulatory encroachment, don’t be surprised if Apple makes some changes to broaden access to different payment apps, and to extend its crypto capabilities—even if the changes are only cosmetic.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on LinkedIn
Tags: AppleApple PayCashAppcryptoVenmo

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    bots fraud, bank security in data sharing, J.P. Morgan fraud protection TSYS, 3D Secure 2.0

    The Evolution of 3D Secure Puts it at the Center of Fraud Prevention

    September 18, 2026
    fraud detection signals

    Why Fraudsters Look Trustworthy and Good Customers Look Suspicious

    September 17, 2026
    Fraud Monitoring, Nacha ACH Rules, Same Day ACH

    10 Years Running, Same Day ACH Continues to Break New Ground

    September 16, 2026
    stablecoin infrastructure

    To Unlock Stablecoins’ Potential, Infrastructure Gaps Must Be Resolved

    September 15, 2026
    Latin America payment orchestration

    Navigating Latin America’s Complex Payment Ecosystem

    September 14, 2026
    upi biometric

    Beyond Authentication: Rethinking Digital Identity Security

    September 11, 2026
    Fraud Monitoring, Nacha ACH Rules, Same Day ACH

    Nacha’s Upcoming Rules Refresh Is All About Improving Clarity

    September 10, 2026
    instant payments for financial institutions

    Why Haven’t More Financial Institutions Adopted Instant Payments?

    September 9, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result