PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

WSJ Identifies 271 ICOs Likely to be Fraudulent – So Trust Can’t Be Created Out of Thin Air!

By Tim Sloane
May 25, 2018
in Analysts Coverage
0
1
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Database Technology Remains Competitive with Blockchains for Many Applications

Database Technology Remains Competitive with Blockchains for Many Applications

The common lie about blockchain is that it establishes trust between participants, but this Wall Street Journal article proves that to be incorrect:

“In a review of documents produced for 1, 450 digital coin offerings, The Wall Street Journal has found 271 with red flags that include plagiarized investor documents, promises of guaranteed returns and missing or fake executive teams.

“ Jeremy Boker” is listed as a co-founder of Denaro, an online-payment project. In investor documents for a public offering in March, which claimed to have raised $8.3 million, Mr. Boker boasted of his cryptocurrency startup’ s “powerhouse” team. In his biography, he noted a “respectable history of happy clients” in consulting before he launched Denaro.

In fact, Mr. Boker’s bio image was a stock photo, there is no evidence he exists and the rest of his team appears to be fictional, except for two freelancers who said they were paid by people unknown to them to market the project, the Journal found.

The principals behind Denaro couldn’t be identified and attempts to reach the company went unanswered. The real person whose image was repurposed as Mr. Boker’s turns out to be Jenish Mirani, a banker in Poland. Mr. Mirani, who had posted the photo on his personal website, said “it was really shocking” to find out about its afterlife”

The immutable ledger can make sure digital documents, once deposited into the ledger, are not tampered with. The problem is that blockchain can’t recognize that the document put in the ledger is a forgery or fake. This is not true for the cryptocurrency that was delivered to the criminals, in that the cryptocurrency is created and managed by the blockchain, whereas the entire ICO contract was just a criminal’s pipedream created externally and then published by the blockchain – any ICO, car registration, bond, or other instrument of value that can be forged in the real world can be deposited into the blockchain – so buyer beware!

Overview by Tim Sloane, VP, Payments Innovation at Mercator Advisory Group

1
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: BlockchainCryptocurrenciesFraud Risk and Analytics

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    tokenized deposits

    As Crypto Challengers Emerge, Banks Turn to Tokenized Deposits

    June 8, 2026
    physical digital debit

    Whether Physical or Digital, Debit Cards Are a Payments Mainstay

    June 5, 2026
    agentic commerce

    Separating Hype from Reality in Emerging Payment Trends

    June 4, 2026
    agentic commerce

    Searching for Trust in Agentic Commerce

    June 3, 2026
    stablecoin

    Stablecoin Success Will Depend on More Than Technology

    June 2, 2026
    A man standing outdoors uses a cryptocurrency trading app on his smartphone. This represents mobile finance, freedom, and real-time investing.

    How Gamification Helps Drive Engagement in Digital Banking

    June 1, 2026
    BIS Wants Central Banks to Move Faster with CBDC amid Looming Stablecoin Pressure

    The Next Phase for Prepaid Cards Could Be Stablecoins

    May 29, 2026
    Synthetic Identities

    A Victimless Crime: Why Synthetic Identities Demand Layered Verification

    May 28, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result