PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Ah, the Difference a Basis Point Makes

By Sarah Grotta
January 11, 2019
in Analysts Coverage, Credit, Debit
0
2
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on LinkedIn
debit basis points

debit basis points

Debit card interchange rates may not change dramatically from year to year, but even small shifts can have a significant financial impact when multiplied across millions of transactions. Recent Federal Reserve data shows how modest changes in interchange rates are affecting financial institutions differently depending on transaction type, while highlighting the growing influence of merchant routing strategies.

Understanding these trends is essential for banks and credit unions looking to optimize debit portfolios, evaluate network relationships, and protect interchange revenue as the payments landscape continues to evolve.

The Federal Reserve, as required by Regulation ii periodically publishes average debit card interchange data by debit card network. An analysis in The Payments Review of this data really puts the impact of a basis point change here and there into perspective:

The Fed released its latest update on debit card interchange, and it showed very subtle but very telling trends for financial institutions with less than $10 billion in assets – a category called “exempt”, which includes all the credit unions in the U.S. except the top 7. While the lines of the graph (found here) look relatively horizontal, two takeaways are worth noting.

On one side of the coin, the average interchange for debit signature transactions (referred to by the Fed as a dual message) is increasing, from 50 cents in 2015 to 52 cents in 2018. While this sounds insignificant, a credit union that sees 100,000 signature transactions a month, is getting close to $24,000 more annually in interchange revenue for these transactions.

On the other side of the coin is debit PIN transactions (referred to by the Fed as a single message). The average interchange for these transactions is declining, from 30 cents in 2013 down to 25 cents in 2018, a full nickel. One of the drivers of this trend is the increasing sophistication of merchant processors to steer PIN transactions to the network that costs them the least. 

With more and more merchants becoming adept at least-cost routing, there are limited options available to issuers, but this article has a suggestion for credit unions that also applies to other financial institutions as well:

The longer-term solution for declining average debit interchange, and a key action for credit unions to take, is to reassess the PIN networks supported by their debit portfolio. Average interchange for PIN transactions range from 35 cents per transaction down to 19 cents, varying by network. If your credit union supports both the highest and lowest charging network, the merchant will always choose the lowest. Credit unions need to evaluate their debit network contracts and optimize to just one unaffiliated network. Luckily, the Fed made the evaluation a little easier by providing a comprehensive comparison in the same updated report.

As merchants become more sophisticated in managing transaction routing, financial institutions must take a proactive approach to their debit network strategies. Reviewing network contracts and understanding how interchange rates vary across PIN and signature transactions can help issuers maximize long-term revenue opportunities.

Even small adjustments in interchange rates can translate into meaningful gains or losses over time, making ongoing portfolio optimization an important part of any debit card strategy.

Overview by Sarah Grotta, Director, Debit and Alternative Products Advisory Service at Mercator Advisory Group

2
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on LinkedIn
Tags: DebitFederal ReserveInterchange

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    tap-to-pay

    Tap-to-Pay Gives Small Merchants a Big Advantage

    July 14, 2026
    cyber resilience

    Modern Cyber Risk Is Breaking Longstanding Security Assumptions

    July 13, 2026
    Merchants Real-Time Payments, swipe fees, BNPL

    How Software Turned Payments Into a Seamless Part of Commerce

    July 10, 2026
    credit union data, credit union technology

    Inside the Tech Shift Redefining How Credit Unions Operate

    July 9, 2026
    embedded payments

    What Embedded Payments Can Solve for Small Businesses

    July 8, 2026
    apple tap to pay

    Build Momentum Behind Zelle for Business

    July 7, 2026
    Accredited Payments Risk Professional

    The Growing Importance of Payments Risk Expertise

    July 6, 2026
    account aggregation

    The Dilemma Facing Financial Institutions: Aggregate or Be Aggregated

    July 2, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result