PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Apple Pay Users Could Lose £1,000 per Transaction via MITM Attack

By Tim Sloane
October 1, 2021
in Analysts Coverage, Fraud & Security, Security
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on LinkedIn
Apple Pay Users Could Lose £1,000 per Transaction via MITM Attack

Apple Pay Users Could Lose £1,000 per Transaction via MITM Attack

Mobile wallet security has become increasingly important as contactless payments continue to replace physical cards for millions of consumers worldwide. Features that prioritize speed and convenience, such as transit payment capabilities, have helped drive widespread adoption of digital wallets, but they also create new opportunities for researchers to identify potential vulnerabilities before they can be exploited at scale. As payment ecosystems become more sophisticated, ensuring strong authentication while preserving a seamless customer experience remains a delicate balancing act.

How the Apple Pay Express Transit Vulnerability Works

Recent research highlighting a potential weakness in Apple Pay’s Express Transit mode underscores the importance of continually evaluating mobile wallet security across the payments ecosystem. The demonstrated attack raises broader questions about where responsibility lies when vulnerabilities involve multiple participants—including device manufacturers, payment networks, and EMV specifications. Although there is no evidence that the exploit has been widely used in the real world, the findings reinforce why collaboration among payment stakeholders is essential to maintaining consumer confidence in contactless payments.

The man-in-the-middle attack vulnerability has been demonstrated by Dr Andreea Radu, the lead researcher at the School of Computer Science at the University of Birmingham. The vulnerability requires that the Apple Pay user have express transit mode enabled, a feature that allows the payment to be initiated at a transit terminal without unlocking the phone. Apple deployed this feature in May of 2019.  One noteworthy point: the attack works through most purses and pockets and modifies the transaction so that it appears the user was authenticated using the Apple biometric of PIN.

Who Is Responsible for the Security Flaw?

One important aspect that isn’t clear is who is responsible for this breach in security. The research team indicates that the flaw is specific to a Visa card within Apple Pay and that neither Apple nor Visa are taking action to fix the flaw. It is unclear if the researchers tested other network cards, such as Amex or Mastercard, to determine If this is a problem in the EMV specification itself or just Visa and Apple’s implementation of EMV:

“However, an experiment conducted by the Universities of Birmingham and Surrey found threat actors are able to exploit a flaw to bypass the Apple Pay lock screen and charge the connected card, in some cases up to £1,000 per transaction, without user authorisation. The owner doesn’t have to leave the device unattended or have it stolen – thieves can also exploit the flaw through a bag or coat, thanks to contactless payment technology.

In a demonstration of the exploit, researchers used an iPhone, an NFC-enabled Android phone, a standard EMV reader payment terminal, and a laptop connected to a Proxmark radio-frequency identification (RFID) scanner.

The Android phone is used as a card emulator to communicate with a payment terminal. Meanwhile, the Proxmark device, connected to a laptop, acts as a reader emulator to communicate with the potential victim’s iPhone, which is led to act as if the transaction is happening with a legitimate transport EMV reader.

Researchers first set up a payment for £1,000 on the payment terminal and ran a script on the laptop to alert the Proxmark RFID scanner to receive the transaction, which then passes it to the payment terminal. Meanwhile, the flaw also manipulates the payment terminal to believe that the victim had authorised the transaction by biometric or PIN verification, enabling the transaction to take place.”

Conclusion

The continued growth of contactless payments makes mobile wallet security a shared responsibility among technology providers, payment networks, financial institutions, merchants, and standards organizations. As new payment features are introduced to improve convenience, ongoing security research plays a vital role in identifying weaknesses before they become widespread threats. Independent academic research helps strengthen the overall payments ecosystem by encouraging vendors to evaluate potential risks and improve existing protections.

The Apple Pay Express Transit findings demonstrate that even mature payment technologies require continuous scrutiny. Whether the vulnerability ultimately stems from Apple Pay, Visa’s implementation, or broader EMV specifications, the research highlights the need for coordinated action whenever multiple parties contribute to the payment experience. Preserving consumer trust will depend on addressing vulnerabilities quickly while continuing to balance security, usability, and innovation in digital payments.

Overview by Tim Sloane, VP, Payments Innovation at Mercator Advisory Group

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on LinkedIn
Tags: Apple PayBiometric AuthenticationEMVSecurityVisa

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    bank chatbot

    How Banks Can Nail the Handoff from Chatbots to Human Agents

    October 15, 2026
    diagonal payments solutions

    The Next Evolution in Payments: Diagonal Thinking

    October 14, 2026
    Mikko Kahkonen

    Making Physical Cards Matter in a Digital World 

    October 13, 2026
    debit loyalty

    Building Loyalty Via Debit Means Maximizing Rewards Potential

    October 12, 2026
    synthetic identity fraud

    Synthetic Identity Fraud Is Surging—and Often Goes Unnoticed

    October 9, 2026
    Gift cards

    Lessons from the Gift Card Forum: The Critical Shift from Breakage to Redemption

    October 8, 2026
    AI-powered fraud prevention

    In the Escalating Fraud Fight, Industry Solidarity Is Imperative

    October 7, 2026
    ownership authentication

    Ownership Authentication: Fighting Fraud Losses and First-Party Risk

    October 6, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result