PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Bank Regulators Outline Expectations for Crypto Custody

By Tom Nawrocki
July 15, 2025
in Digital Assets & Crypto, News
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
bitcoin mining system, Centralized cryptocurrency exchanges

Three major federal bank regulatory agencies issued a joint statement warning banks about the risks associated with taking custody of cryptocurrency assets. While the statement does not impose new regulations on crypto custody, it signals a significant shift—indicating that the federal government is now fully engaged on this issue, a notable departure from the previous administration’s stance.

The statement, issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, reiterates that existing risk management principles apply to the safekeeping of crypto assets and reminds banks of their obligation to comply with applicable laws and regulations. It also clarifies that banks may provide safekeeping services for crypto assets, whether in a fiduciary or non-fiduciary capacity.

The statement highlights the legal and compliance risks related to crypto assets, especially concerning anti-money laundering and the Bank Secrecy Act. It calls on institutions to carefully assess operational, legal, and technological risks before launching crypto-related services. The regulators also emphasize the importance of employee training, stating that all personnel involved in crypto asset safekeeping must have adequate knowledge and understanding of the associated risks and requirements.

The Legacy of SAB 121

The statement marks the final rollback of a previous SEC rule, Staff Accounting Bulletin 121, that had limited financial institutions from holding crypto directly. That rule required banks maintaining custody of crypto to record those holdings on their own balance sheets.

The requirement originated from a staff bulletin intended as guidance on existing accounting standards, but many lawmakers viewed it as regulatory overreach. It led Senator Cynthia Lummis, (R-Wyo.), a crypto supporter, to describe SAB 121 as “a rule under the administrative procedure act, disguised as an accounting guidance.”

ETFs Raise the Issue

Despite the restriction, banks continued offering crypto custody services, and by mid-2024, U.S. banks collectively held nearly $16 billion in digital assets. The issue gained further prominence following the introduction of exchange-traded funds in early 2024. Since SAB 121 deterred banks from holding bitcoin, those assets were concentrated in a small number of institutions. Overturning the rule opens the door for more banks and other organizations to hold digital assets directly.

Last year, the Senate voted in a bipartisan effort to overturn the rule, though President Biden opposed the new regulation. SAB 121 was eventually rescinded just four days after President Trump took office. Shortly after, the SEC published SAB 122, stating that institutions should assess the risk of loss associated with crypto custody and record that amount as a contingent liability on their balance sheet.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: Crypto CustodiansCryptocurrencyFDICFederal ReserveOCCSAB 121

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    first-party fraud

    Inside the Growth of First-Party Fraud

    May 8, 2026
    fraud passkey, passkeys

    The Passkey You Can’t Steal: Why Hardware Beats Software for High-Stakes Authentication 

    May 7, 2026
    automotive collections

    Reducing Friction in Automotive Collections

    May 6, 2026
    payment cards as customer experience

    From Hygiene Factor to Hero Product: Why the Card Deserves a Second Look

    May 5, 2026
    cobrand credit card

    Co-Branded Credit Cards Still Hold Promise for Smaller Issuers

    May 4, 2026
    Dual-rail recurring billing for agentic commerce

    Fueling Agentic Commerce with Dual-Rail Recurring Billing

    May 1, 2026
    credit union p2p

    How Should Legacy Banks Compete with Chime?

    April 30, 2026
    Prepaid cards for payroll and tipping

    Tips on a Prepaid Card: A Practical Solution with Broad Industry Impacts

    April 29, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result