PaymentsJournal
SUBSCRIBE
  • Analysts Coverage
  • Truth In Data
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Industry Opinions
  • News
  • Resources
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
  • Analysts Coverage
  • Truth In Data
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Industry Opinions
  • News
  • Resources
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Blurring the Lines between Tech and Banking

Aaron McPherson by Aaron McPherson
November 25, 2019
in Analysts Coverage, Banking, Digital Banking, Featured Content
0
Blurring the Lines between Tech and Banking

Blurring the Lines between Tech and Banking

6
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

The narrative on fintechs has been consistent for many years—fintechs pose a direct threat to banks. PWC released a report in 2016, “How FinTech is reshaping banking” that found that banks saw multiple threats from fintechs, including loss of market share, pressure on margins, security, and customer churn. The argument was that banks had to reinvent themselves to be more like the fintechs, as discussed at CNBC’s East Tech West even in Guangzhou, China in mid-November).

“Why Every Company Wants To Look Like a Bank – Without Becoming One,” a recent article on Fortune.com, points out that the narrative seems to be changing. According to the article:

… this flurry of banking activity is also the latest example of an ongoing evolution in how big tech companies and their financial counterparts compete and, increasingly, cooperate. Tech companies have spent much of the past decade trying to break into financial services—but these days, they’ve all but given up on going it alone.

The immediate trigger for the article was reporting in the Wall Street Journal about an upcoming partnership between Google and Citigroup Inc. (plus a credit union at Stanford University) to offer checking accounts to consumers, but as the article makes clear, other bigtech or fintech companies are looking to do the same thing, after years of unsuccessful efforts to actually get bank charters. The difficulties the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is experiencing in pushing through its special bank charter for fintech companies have evidently forced tech companies to conclude that they will have to partner with banks if they want to get into financial services.

Of course, this is nothing new; for decades, certain banks, which we call “arms merchants,” have helped non-banks enter the banking sector, most prominently in the general purpose prepaid card area. This has always been a weakness of the “fintech threat” perspective: the real threat to banks is other banks, not fintechs.  It is unclear exactly what the “market share” threat cited in the PWC study was based on; if a fintech took away banking business, it was usually through partnering with an arms merchant, so that bank would be the one taking share. 

Citigroup has evidently decided to pursue that strategy now. Giving other examples, the article states:

Even some fintech startups that call themselves banks, like “mobile banking app” Chime, rely on outside partners to do most of the regulated banking stuff; some of Chime’s banking services are provided by the institution with the magnificently redundant name of The Bancorp Bank.

Perhaps the most interesting question raised by the Fortune article is not why tech companies would want to partner with banks, but why the banks would want to enable them. The advocates of reinvention seem to have missed an alternative strategy: embrace the role of payments utility, and focus on providing basic banking services at scale for the lowest possible cost. This does not, of course, substitute for improvements in customer service and channels, but the two strategies can co-exist.

In Europe, the situation is more straightforward: having been forced to open up their capabilities to non-banks through the Payment Service Directive 2, banks increasingly see their future as providing the infrastructure for banking and payments through a variety of partners. Direct competition from neobanks like Revolut, N26 and others has also forced a reckoning. 

The longtime obsession with “controlling” a customer who no longer wants to be controlled is being replaced with a strategy of adding value to a larger value chain. Vertical integration is being replaced with specialization, enabling more efficient use of resources and faster growth. For large banks like Citigroup, this is the easiest way of expanding without acquisitions that will attract antitrust scrutiny. 

It is time to abandon the apocalyptic vision of fintechs as the enemy of banks, and recognize, as Pogo famously put it, “We have met the enemy, and he is us.”  The true threat is the banks themselves, specifically the large institutions that already control much of the financial system.

Contributed by Aaron McPherson, VP, Research Operations at Mercator Advisory Group

Tags: BankingCitiDigital BankingFintechN26OCCPSD2PWC
6
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

    Analyst Coverage, Payments Data, and News Delivered Daily

    Sign up for the PaymentsJournal Newsletter to get exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    Online Grocery Sales Efforts Take A Giant (Stores) Step Forward

    Did Payments Innovation Kill Brick-and-Mortar?

    October 2, 2023
    open-banking Data-Sharing as a Solution to Cash Flow Issues standa

    Disjointed Open-Banking System in U.S. Leaves Opening for Permissioned Data Providers

    September 29, 2023
    FedNow

    FedNow Could Mean a Renaissance for Smaller Financial Institutions

    September 28, 2023
    Best Merchant Practices for Dealing with Supply Chain Disruption

    Nearly Half of Merchant Data is Probably Wrong. Here’s Why it Matters.

    September 27, 2023
    Mitigation of P2P Fraud Begins with Education

    Mitigation of P2P Fraud Begins with Education

    September 26, 2023
    digital payments

    Mass A2A Payment Adoption in The U.S. Contingent on Compelling USP

    September 25, 2023
    Samsung trackable cashless payments mobile

    The Synergy Between Cashless Payments and Seamless Mobile Coverage

    September 22, 2023
    The Power of AI and How its Transforming the Financial Landscape

    The Power of AI and How It’s Transforming the Financial Landscape

    September 21, 2023

    Linkedin-in Twitter

    Advertise With Us | About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Subscribe
    ©2023 PaymentsJournal.com

    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    Menu
    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Industry Opinions
    • Recent News
    • Resources
    Menu
    • Industry Opinions
    • Recent News
    • Resources
    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Industry Opinions
    • Faster Payments
    • News
    • Jobs
    • Events
    No Result
    View All Result