PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Buyers Value Various Features of Virtual Cards for AP Payments

By Meitra Aycock
June 24, 2013
in Industry Opinions
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Comdata, along with MasterCard and Kaiser Associates, launched a survey in January 2013 to both buyers and suppliers within the Accounts Payable and Accounts Receivable ecosystem. Our respondents included 54 Comdata customer buyers and 222 suppliers across our customer base, meaning that these suppliers currently accept card as payment for invoices.

Surveys of buyers in this market are commonplace, and our results certainly confirmed what we all believe about the use of virtual cards for AP payments. Buyers value the following features associated with a virtual card program:

• Increased control
• Reduced costs
• Greater efficiency in processing.

No surprises on that front, and we have collectively been successful in highlighting those benefits in the value proposition posed to company CFOs and Controllers.

Even though the valued features were no surprise, there were two data points from suppliers that did intrigue us. In the first point, we learned that many suppliers reported an increase in sales due to credit card acceptance as well as an increase in revenue.

While we were surprised by this finding, it made sense when viewed through the nascent lens of B2B card payments. Before consumer card acceptance became ubiquitous, merchants incorporated the fact that they accepted credit cards into their value pitch to consumers and used card acceptance as a point of differentiation. Therefore, we contend that the same differentiation could exist for AP suppliers if they chose to market this acceptance.

The second noteworthy point in the survey came from a mirrored question posed both to buyers and suppliers. We asked buyers how much control they felt they had in dictating method of payment in AP invoices, and less than 40% felt they had a high degree of negotiating power with suppliers in choosing method of payment.

Similarly, we asked suppliers how likely they would be to accept a card from a buyer who mandated it as the method of payment, and the majority of respondents said they were likely to accept the mandate.

To all of those AP managers who worry about damaging the relationships with suppliers, this is indeed food for thought in your AP payments strategy.

Meitra has more than 16 years of experience working both domestically and internationally in the financial services industry. She currently serves as Vice President of product management for Comdata’s corporate payment solutions. Prior to Comdata, Meitra held a number of senior roles at Total Systems Services (TSYS), including positions in product strategy and relationship management.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: Credit

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    embedded payments finance

    How Developers Are Driving the Future of Embedded Payments

    February 19, 2026
    gift card strategy

    The Gift Card Shift: From Convenience to Core Shopping Strategy

    February 18, 2026
    Tina Shirley

    From Cross-Border Payments to Community Banks: The Future of Zelle®

    February 17, 2026
    Startups: Fintechs Data Streaming Technology in Banking, corporates Enriched Data vs Faster Payments

    Fighting Fraud in the Era of Faster Payments

    February 13, 2026
    cross-border payments

    Solving for Fraud in Cross-Border Payments Requires Better Counterparty Verification

    February 12, 2026
    agentic commerce

    Demystifying the Agentic Commerce Enigma

    February 11, 2026
    payment gateways

    How Payment Gateways for Businesses Can Help You Offer Your Customers More Options

    February 10, 2026
    Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Extends Mandate for Tokenization to June '22

    Late Payments? Governments Are Taking Action

    February 9, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2024 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result