This article in the MIT Technology Review looks at the problems associated with crypto exchanges addressing the guidance that came out of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). FATF sent a recommendation to its 37 member jurisdictions worldwide that would impose new ruled on “virtual asset service providers.” The rule, which appears to be aligned with the Travel rule in the U.S., requires exchanges to share information about the identities of the sender and receiver of transfers over a certain threshold, as is done today with SWIFT.
Here’s more from the MIT Technology Review:
“SWIFT, but for crypto? Critics have argued that the new rule is onerous because it calls on the industry to build a completely new technical infrastructure for sharing information. Because of the pseudonymous nature of cryptocurrency, it’s not necessarily obvious to exchanges, for instance, when a customer is sending money to another exchange. All they can see is a string of letters and numbers, so the sender could just as well be transferring money to another wallet the same person controls. Now exchanges will somehow have to identify themselves. Others have argued that the rule will drive would-be money launderers to use services and tools that are harder to police. Nonetheless, the industry has been left with no choice but to come up with something like the SWIFT network, but for crypto. And they’ve got to come up with something fast; FATF plans to review its progress in June.
A complicated mess: According to a new, detailed look inside the process by CoinDesk, thorny questions remain about how exactly exchanges should transmit information to each other. Should that process use a blockchain, or rely on a more traditional, centralized design? Should it be a commercial product or based on open-source software? Should exchanges deploy multiple products or should they all try to agree on one? According to CoinDesk, there are more than 20 different products under development at the moment.
Legal headaches, too: The problem is not purely a technological one. If exchanges have to exchange information that identifies their customers, they will also need to navigate data privacy laws like the European Union’s GDPR.”
Regulatory constraints continue to vex all participants using cryptocurrency.
Overview by Tim Sloane, VP, Payments Innovation at Mercator Advisory Group