PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

FTC Snags Another ISO

By Don Apgar
March 18, 2022
in Analysts Coverage, Fraud & Security, Fraud Risk and Analytics, Merchant
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
FTC Snags Another ISO

FTC Snags Another ISO

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has a long history of protecting consumers from scammers, fraudsters, and snake oil salesmen. In the analog 20th century, the FTC worked closely with the US Postal Service to rein in the get-rich-quick solicitations that were mailed by the millions, and the checks that were mailed back by so many hopeful buyers. In our digital era, the FTC pursues bad actors using the Watergate plan of “Follow the Money.” Schemers advertise in some very innovative places, but the funds roll into their coffers through electronic credit and debit card payments, and stopping their ability to accept cards effectively shuts down the fraud. 

This most recent case involves Money Now Funding (MNF), who in 2015 settled allegations with the FTC that it had telemarketed worthless business opportunities to consumers and falsely promised that consumers would earn thousands of dollars in income. Ordinarily this would be the end of the FTC’s involvement, but as in other cases, the FTC alleges that there was another possible layer of fraud at work here. The card networks police bad actors in the payments ecosystem by enforcing a chargeback limit at 1% of transactions. This means that if more than 1 of every 100 sales are disputed by consumers, the business is deemed to be fraudulent and excluded from accepting branded payment cards. 

In the case of MNF, their merchant processing services were provided by Independent Sales Organization (ISO) Electronic Payment Systems (EPS). The FTC alleges that EPS enabled the fraud perpetrated by MNF by opening 43 different merchant accounts that intentionally obscured the true nature of the underlying transactions and allowed MNF to avoid detection of exceeding the 1% chargeback threshold that would have alerted card network compliance teams. Many times, companies like MNF have difficulty gaining access to merchant card acceptance services, and companies willing to provide those services will charge fees significantly higher than a business like a restaurant would pay, making these types of accounts potentially very profitable for companies like EPS.

On March 15, the FTC released a consent agreement with EPS and its owners John Dorsey and Thomas McCann for allegedly opening credit card processing merchant accounts for fictitious companies on behalf of Money Now Funding (MNF).

“Companies involved in payment processing can’t ignore red flags that fraudsters are using the system to steal people’s money,” said Samuel Levine, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “It’s urgent that our authority to get money to consumers be restored, but in the meantime, we’ll do everything we can to stop scammers and those who help them.”

According to the EPS website, they are sponsored into the payment networks by Esquire Bank, of Jericho, NY, and to date no announcement has been made about whether sanctions will be applied to Esquire.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: ChargebackChargebacksFraudFraud DetectionFraud Risk and AnalyticsFTCMerchantMerchantsScamTelemarketing Fraud

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    Startups: Fintechs Data Streaming Technology in Banking, corporates Enriched Data vs Faster Payments

    Fighting Fraud in the Era of Faster Payments

    February 13, 2026
    cross-border payments

    Solving for Fraud in Cross-Border Payments Requires Better Counterparty Verification

    February 12, 2026
    agentic commerce

    Demystifying the Agentic Commerce Enigma

    February 11, 2026
    payment gateways

    How Payment Gateways for Businesses Can Help You Offer Your Customers More Options

    February 10, 2026
    Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Extends Mandate for Tokenization to June '22

    Late Payments? Governments Are Taking Action

    February 9, 2026
    ai phishing

    The Fraud Epidemic Is Testing the Limits of Cybersecurity

    February 6, 2026
    stablecoins b2b payments

    Stablecoins and the Future of B2B Payments: Faster, Cheaper, Better

    February 5, 2026
    Payment Facilitator

    The Payment Facilitator Model as a Growth Strategy for ISVs

    February 4, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2024 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result