PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Swift Develops Rules for Retail Cross-Border Payments

By Wesley Grant
September 26, 2025
in Cross-border Payments, Emerging Payments, Featured Content
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
swift cross-border

Banks financial transfer money. Online Banking. Business

The Swift messaging system has long been a central player in improving international transactions, and the network now has its sights set on streamlining retail payments.

This retail push marks a shift for Swift, which has traditionally been used for larger intrabank or business-to-business payments. After collaborating with roughly 30 banks across 17 countries, Swift is rolling out new rules aimed at ensuring greater transparency and efficiency in retail cross-border payments.

Under the updated guidelines, Swift said retail users will benefit from transactions that are faster than the benchmarks set by Group of 20 (G20) countries, with roughly three-quarters of payments reaching the beneficiary bank in under 10 minutes. The system is also designed to eliminate hidden fees and, where possible, use domestic real-time payments systems to facilitate instant settlement.

The Correspondent Bank Model

There has been a surge in demand for cross-border payments as global communications channels have expanded. However, the process remains largely dominated by the longstanding correspondent banking system, in which banks hash out their own partnerships with overseas counterparts.

These partnerships can involve multiple intermediaries, making transactions in this model a slow and often convoluted process. Adding to the complexity are the manual procedures that define these relationships, which create the opportunities for delays, errors, and fraud.

“There’s a concept called nostro and vostro where you’ve got banks that have pots of cash with one another,” Hugh Thomas, Lead Commercial & Enterprise Payments Analyst at Javelin Strategy & Research, told PaymentsJournal. “The nostro is mine that sits with you, and vostro is yours that sits with me. They just sort of net and pool at the end of every day and figure out, ‘OK, you’ve got this much more vostro with me and I’ve got this much more nostro with you as a consequence of us having done these transactions.’ Those are, in many cases, manual processes.”

In the end, banks in the correspondent banking system must often rely on trust, assuming that each institution in the chain is doing its part.

Getting Payments to the Finish Line

As a messaging network, Swift’s role has been to streamline communication between financial institutions. This has had a significant impact, especially on what Swift describes as the “in-flight” portion of a transaction—though this stage represents only about 20% of the total time for an average cross-border payment.

The bigger challenge lies in the final leg, after the payment exits the Swift network. This stage is far more time-consuming, with roughly 80% of transaction time spent navigating regional nuances like regulations, fees, and domestic infrastructure.

Looking for Alternatives

Although Swift’s new framework could smooth many aspects of the cross-border payments process, many of these issues are likely to persist. This is why there have been many alternatives that have been proposed as cross-border solutions.

Visa and Mastercard have already built robust global networks to support their credit cards, and they are now leveraging these systems to—in effect—create a better version of the correspondent banking system. These platforms, dubbed Visa Direct and Mastercard Move, connect to banks around the world and have the liquidity and foreign exchange capabilities to become a compelling alternative to correspondent banking.

Other contenders for cross-border payments market share are crypto and digital assets, which allow for seamless, secure, and transparent transactions across a blockchain. Due to the lack of volatility, fiat-backed stablecoins such as those offered by Circle and Tether have established a strong use case in cross-border payments.

There are also a growing number of networks that connect domestic infrastructures, such as PayPal World. Instead of connecting financial institutions, this solution connects digital payments systems like India’s UPI and China’s WeChat Pay with PayPal’s ecosystem.

Preserving Its Role

Although there are more cross-border payments systems and solutions than ever, Swift continues to play a critical, well-established role. The network is actively upgrading its platform and, later this year, will require participants to utilize the ISO 20022 protocol, which dramatically increases the amount of data that can accompany payments.

This enhancement could drastically reduce delays cause by incomplete payment instructions and potentially save organizations millions of dollars in costs associated with delayed or failed payments.

In parallel, Swift is piloting digital asset transactions on its network, aiming to bridge the gap between decentralized and traditional finance.

Together with initiatives such as its new rules for retail cross-border payments, these developments are likely to reinforce Swift’s role in the global payments landscape. Still, it remains uncertain whether one solution will emerge as the standard for international transactions—or if cross-border payments will continue to be a fragmented market.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: Correspondent BanksCross-BorderCross-Border PaymentsDigital AssetsISO20022PayPalReal-Time Cross-Border paymentsSwift

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    embedded payments

    Embedding Payments for Growth: How ISVs Can Scale Through Vertical Focus and Partnerships

    March 31, 2026
    ACH fraud monitoring

    From a Checkbox to a Differentiator: Redefining ACH Fraud Monitoring

    March 30, 2026
    Digitization and Multi-Brand Cards: Prepaid Trends. Bancorp Bank prepaid card fees, Bitpay Prepaid Card, mobile prepaid debit cards, prepaid cards for councils

    Turning a Prepaid Card into a Long-Term Relationship

    March 27, 2026
    payments fraud, faster payments fraud, financial fraud

    The Emotional Toll of Financial Fraud

    March 26, 2026
    hyperliquid

    What Hyperliquid Reveals About the Future of Trading

    March 25, 2026
    Modernizing Payments modernizaion

    Modernizing Payments: Tackling the Toughest Tech Challenges

    March 24, 2026
    fintech bank data

    The Growing Data Battle Between Banks and Fintechs

    March 23, 2026
    7 Fabulous AI Chatbot Trends for Small Business, AI chatbots in business, chatbots instant gratification millennials

    What Banking Customers Want—and Don’t Want—From Chatbots

    March 20, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result