PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

CFPB: A Consumer Protection or a Political Football?

By Brian Riley
July 1, 2020
in Analysts Coverage, Compliance and Regulation, Credit, Digital Assets & Crypto, News
0
2
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
CFPB credit card disputes

CFPB: A Consumer Protection or a Political Football?

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a quasi-federal agency, was born from the Great Recession. Since its founding, it helped reduce deceptive trade practices, increased financial literacy, and studied the pain points of consumer lending. To keep the organization independent, its structure was set up differently than many other programs, until yesterday’s Supreme Court decision. NPR Reports:

  • The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that the President can fire at will the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau but left intact the rest of the statute that created the agency. Congress created the independent agency in 2010 to protect consumers from abuses in the banking and financial services industry that led to the 2008 financial meltdown.
  • To ensure the CFPB’s independence, the law creating the agency called for it to be headed by a single director, confirmed by the Senate, who would serve a five-year term and who could only be fired for malfeasance, inefficiency or neglect of duty.
  • The decision was a victory for President Trump and for forces in the business community that has long sought to trim the sails of independent regulatory agencies, from the CFPB to multimember-led agencies, among them the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Communications Commission and many more.

The good news is that the President has the power to terminate the Director of the CFPB, but not the department, as Forbes states.

  • The U.S. Supreme Court this week ruled the President can fire the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) at will, but it otherwise left the bureau intact. The outcome could have been much different.
  • The ruling comes as a victory for the Trump administration, which has long argued the CFPB—a watchdog agency created under the Obama administration to guard against abuses in the banking and financial services industries—is too powerful. While the court said restrictions on when the President can remove the Director were unconstitutional, it found the independent agency itself should continue to operate.
  • “The agency may … continue to operate, but its Director, in light of our decision, must be removable by the President at will,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in his majority decision.
  • The CFPB, unlike other independent agencies, has a single director who is nominated by the President and then confirmed by Congress, and serves a five-year term. There has long been debate over whether the CFPB director therefore has too much power and goes against the constitution. 

There are bigger fish to fry than controlling the destiny of a political appointee who has done a fine job since replacing Richard Cordray.

The recession is here, stress tests are at risk, and credit quality is an issue!

Overview by Brian Riley, Director, Credit Advisory Service at Mercator Advisory Group

2
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: CFPB

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    payment api

    Open Banking Has Made Payment APIs a Burgeoning Revenue Stream

    June 12, 2026
    payment card innovation

    Serving a Segment of One: The Race to Stay Top of Wallet

    June 11, 2026
    healthcare payments

    The Healthcare Payments Industry Has a Perception Problem

    June 10, 2026
    continuous KYC

    The Future of KYC Is Layered—and Data-Driven

    June 9, 2026
    tokenized deposits

    As Crypto Challengers Emerge, Banks Turn to Tokenized Deposits

    June 8, 2026
    physical digital debit

    Whether Physical or Digital, Debit Cards Are a Payments Mainstay

    June 5, 2026
    agentic commerce

    Separating Hype from Reality in Emerging Payment Trends

    June 4, 2026
    agentic commerce

    Searching for Trust in Agentic Commerce

    June 3, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result