PaymentsJournal
SUBSCRIBE
  • Analysts Coverage
  • Truth In Data
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Industry Opinions
  • News
  • Resources
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
  • Analysts Coverage
  • Truth In Data
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Industry Opinions
  • News
  • Resources
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Consumers Still Confused Over BofA, L.L. Bean Split

Mercator Advisory Group by Mercator Advisory Group
March 25, 2013
in Analysts Coverage
0

Guest makes card payment at check-in desk of hotel, detail

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

While retailers change their cobranded card issuers periodically (and sometimes the network brand on their cards), the event is usually noted just in the trade press. In New England, where both LL Bean and Bank of America share high visibility, L.L. Bean’s switch to Barclay’s from Bank of America continues to have a high media profile some five years after the split.

From the Boston Globe:

The split between Bank of America and L.L. Bean appears to have been particularly acrimonious. L.L. Bean, based in Freeport, Maine, originally hired Delaware credit card giant MBNA in 1996 to run a co-branded card. But L.L. Bean said it received a growing number of complaints from customers after Bank of America bought MBNA in 2006.

L.L. Bean ended the agreement in June 2008 and tapped British financial giant Barclays to take over the business. Bank of America, however, decided to keep the old L.L. Bean branded card accounts open. And when those cards were about to expire, Bank of America issued replacement cards with a mountain scene similar to the one on L.L. Bean cards.

The Charlotte, N.C.-based bank even used the image of a hiker on a mountain top carrying sporting goods gear in related promotional material.
L.L. Bean was so aggrieved that it filed a lawsuit in federal court accusing the bank of deliberately trying to deceive customers. Bank of America denied the allegations, including the suggestion that L.L. Bean had exclusive rights to “mountains or mountain scenes.”

In 2009, a judge declined to order Bank of America to cancel the old L.L. Bean cards, ruling there was “room for reasonable minds to differ” over the meaning of the contract. Both companies ultimately agreed to take the matter to arbitration.

Neither Bank of America nor L.L. Bean would say how the arbitrator ruled, although L.L. Bean said most of the customer confusion has subsided. And a Bank of America spokeswoman pointed out that its cards are “clearly marked with the Bank of America brand” on the front and back.

Deal terms indeed are at the heart of such agreements (and disputes). Issuers may retain the ability to issue cards to the existing customer portfolio under some contracts, even if the agreement lapses. In such cases, the issuer usually attempts to map the customer to the closest available card product in terms of its features in order to maximize chances for cardholder retention.

Unknown, of course, is the degree of cardholder confusion that may ensue should a cobranded program unravel. Cardholders may not appreciate the fact that the retailer is not the issuer, but rather is the bank partner. And just to make things even more complex, it is well know that some consumers think the card is issued by the network (i.e. Visa. MasterCard).

Click here to read more from the Boston Globe.

Tags: Credit
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

    Analyst Coverage, Payments Data, and News Delivered Daily

    Sign up for the PaymentsJournal Newsletter to get exclusive insight and data from Mercator Advisory Group analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    eCommerce On Social Media, social commerce

    The Rise of Social Commerce and Social Payments

    February 3, 2023
    Electroneum AnyTask; ETN Crypto, sales enablement

    Ethical Financial Selling: The Role of Compliance Technology and Sales Enablement

    February 2, 2023
    direct deposit

    Nacha Launches Campaign to Reach Millennials on the Benefits of Direct Deposit

    February 1, 2023
    Equinix Helps UK-Based Payments Provider Enable Faster, More Reliable Payments Processing

    Equinix Helps UK-Based Payments Provider Enable Faster, More Reliable Payments Processing

    January 31, 2023
    credit card tumbling

    How to Detect, and Prevent, Credit Card Tumbling

    January 30, 2023
    Why Businesses Need to Adopt Real-Time Payments as a Competitive Differentiator

    Why Businesses Need to Adopt Real-Time Payments as a Competitive Differentiator

    January 27, 2023
    faster payments

    Faster Payments Are Set to Revolutionize Modern Digital Payments

    January 26, 2023
    How AI can Help Manage Payments Risk in 2023

    How AI can Help Manage Payments Risk in 2023

    January 25, 2023

    • Advertise With Us
    • About Us
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe
    ADVERTISEMENT
    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Industry Opinions
    • News
    • Resources

    © 2022 PaymentsJournal.com

    • Analysts Coverage
    • Truth In Data
    • Podcasts
    • Industry Opinions
    • Faster Payments
    • News
    • Jobs
    • Events
    No Result
    View All Result

      Register to download the Equinix report - Dojo Delivers Fast, Reliable and Secure Card Payments to Businesses on Platform Equinix