PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Happy Regulators are Productive Regulators: Some Work to Do at CFPB

By Brian Riley
January 15, 2020
in Analysts Coverage, Compliance and Regulation, Digital Assets & Crypto
0
2
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Employee surveys provide an interesting view of an organization from the inside out.  If done well, people do not feel intimidated and you can get a good look at what makes the organization tick.  Surveys tend to be a sounding board, so trends are more important than actual numbers.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau recently published its results for 2019.  The first number that grabbed my eye was the equal distribution of men versus women, at 50/50.  This is far better than numbers I recall from my personal experience at HFC, Citi, Chase, and First Union National Bank.

The agency operated with 1,424 FTE and had a 65.2% response rate, which represented 929 people.

Work environment is favorable, but there is opportunity

  • Staff like what they do:
    • Only 6.3% disagreed or strongly disagreed with the statement.
  • However, a large number of staff did not feel as if they had sufficient resources.
    • Less than half strongly agreed or disagreed that they had sufficient resources to do their job.
    • 58.7% believed their workload was reasonable.
    • Only 3.8% did not see the importance of their work.
    • A large block of staff, 36.4%, did not feel personally empowered at their job.
    • Almost a quarter of the team, 24.8%, did not feel as if their talents were used well.

Co-worker perception seemed somewhat low

  • There was a high perception of those who knew what was expected of them at work at 92.3% indicating agreement or neutral.
  • The steps taken to deal with a poor performer was low, with 41.6% disagreeing with the statement, “In my work unit, steps are taken to deal with a poor performer.”
  • And to the question of “In my work unit, differences in performance were recognized in a meaningful manner”, 40.4% disagreed.

My surprise: Mixed reviews on upper management

  • There were strong indications of collaboration among work groups, with only 16% disagreeing about the level of cooperation.
  • In answering the question about senior leadership maintaining high standards for honesty, ratings were far below my perception of the CFPB.  12.8% strongly agreed to the question, 26.7% agreed, 27.7% were neutral.  15.3% disagreed and 17.6% strongly disagreed.
  • To their question of “How satisfied are you with the policies and practices of senior leaders, only 30.3% answered favorably, less than the 30.4% who were neutral and the 39.3% who responded negatively.

At the end of the day, job satisfaction was better than average, but more were happier with their job than their pay.

  • 15.7% disagreed that “Considering everything how satisfied are you with your job.”
  • But more than a quarter did not respond well on pay: 27.1% were not satisfied with their pay.
  • 23% were not happy with the organization.

There are a few takeaways from the CFPB staff survey.  The work environment appears good.  There seemed to be issues on dealing with lower ranked staff, and senior management seems to have some work in front of them.  There are rumblings by a quarter of the crew on management, which is not out of bounds on many other surveys of this type.

Keep in mind.  A happy regulator is a friendly regulator.

Overview by Brian Riley, Director, Credit Advisory Service at Mercator Advisory Group

2
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: CFBPCompliance and RegulationEmployee Satisfaction

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    tokenization

    Tokenization: From Security Tool to Future-Ready Payments

    March 10, 2026
    SMB banks

    Despite Fintech Encroachment, Banks Can Remain the Go-To for SMBs

    March 9, 2026
    retirement investing

    Young Customers May Not Prioritize Retirement Investing, But Banks Should

    March 6, 2026
    payment fraud

    From Reaction to Prevention: Rethinking Payment Fraud

    March 5, 2026
    first-party-fraud

    Returns, Disputes, and the Rise of First-Party Fraud

    March 4, 2026
    commercial payments

    From Theory to Application: The Impending Transformation of Commercial Payments

    March 3, 2026
    Payments Modernization, ACH payments

    ACH and the Path Toward Future-Ready Payments

    March 2, 2026
    millennial gen z business owner

    Gen Z and Millennials Are Business Owners: Are Banks Ready?

    February 27, 2026

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2026 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result