PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result
SIGN UP
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
PaymentsJournal
  • Commercial
  • Credit
  • Debit
  • Digital Assets & Crypto
  • Digital Banking
  • Emerging Payments
  • Fraud & Security
  • Merchant
  • Prepaid
No Result
View All Result
PaymentsJournal
No Result
View All Result

Rethinking Private Label: Can Decoupled Debit Relieve Retailers’ Interchange Pain?

By Michael Misasi
December 10, 2012
in Mercator Insights
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
durbin amendment

Since the financial crisis started, consumershave demonstrated an aversion to borrowing, and to some extent, theentire category of credit products. Members of the millennialgeneration, many of whose parents are still feeling the pain ofexcessive credit card spending, now prefer debit. Consumers’ fearof debt impacts private label credit in particular because thesecards typically carry higher interest rates than general-purposecards.

As the economy strengthens, many banks appear to be looking forsigns of a recovery in the market for private label credit. As faras I can tell, there is little reason to believe it’s comingtomorrow. For now, retailers’ payments strategies might be betterserved by implementing a decoupled debit program.

Like private label credit, decoupled debit programs have theability to generate incremental sales through increased loyalty andalso reduce payment-acceptance costs. Decoupled debit programsdon’t produce interest income, but they also don’t include the riskof credit losses. This is a trade-off many retailers should bewilling to make. Several of them sold their credit portfoliosduring the financial crisis, acknowledging that consumer lendingexposed them to too much risk given that it is not central to theretail business.

Decoupled debit programs do have their own risks, however,primarily ACH settlement risk since the issuer doesn’t havereal-time access to a customer’s DDA balance. However, this risk ismore easily managed than credit default risk.

Merchants that aren’t sold on the merits of a well-executeddecoupled debit program need only look at the performance ofTarget’s REDcard program. REDcard spending reached 14% penetrationof in-store sales in the third quarter 2012. Kansas City locations,which conducted a one year pilot before Target expanded the programnationally, already have attained 20% REDcard penetration. Nationalretailers can certainly appreciate the significance of eliminatinginterchange related expenses on 20% of sales.

Target offers private-label credit and decoupled debit REDcards,but debit account activation is driving the program’s growth. Atthe end of 2011 spending on Target credit cards accounted for 6.8%of sales, but spending on Target debit cards accounted for only2.5% of sales. This gap is closing at a remarkable pace 2012. Inthe third quarter, penetration of Target credit cards increased to8% of sales, but debit cards grew to 6%. Over the life of theprogram, consumers have opened about three debit accounts for everyone credit account.

There may be an opportunity for other retailers to increase salesand decrease payment acceptance costs by combining a decoupleddebit card with a differentiated loyalty program.

What do you think? Is private label credit on the rebound? Is therea future in decoupled debit? Private label and co-branded productsare an ongoing research topic, and I appreciate any comments. Youcan contact me via the link below.

0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Tags: Banking ChannelsCompliance and RegulationCreditDebitEMVFraud Risk and AnalyticsMerchant AcquiringMobile PaymentsPoint of SalePrepaidSelf Service and ConvenienceSocial Media

    Get the Latest News and Insights Delivered Daily

    Subscribe to the PaymentsJournal Newsletter for exclusive insight and data from Javelin Strategy & Research analysts and industry professionals.

    Must Reads

    supply chain payments

    The Payment Process: The Supply Chain’s Most Overlooked Cyber Risk

    July 17, 2025
    Navigating Global Fintech Regulations Through Strategic Regulatory Arbitrage

    Navigating Global Fintech Regulations Through Strategic Regulatory Arbitrage

    July 16, 2025
    AI Is Turning Accounts Receivable Into a Strategic Powerhouse

    AI Is Turning Accounts Receivable Into a Strategic Powerhouse

    July 15, 2025
    Embedded Finance

    Embedded Finance: Bringing Payments Under a Single Umbrella

    July 14, 2025
    Making Real-Time Payments a Reality

    Fulfilling the Promise: Making Real-Time Payments a Reality

    July 10, 2025
    mortgage

    The Rich Benefits of In-House Payment Systems

    July 9, 2025
    digital cards

    Beyond Plastic: Why Digital Cards Are the Future

    July 8, 2025
    What Premium Card Overhauls by Chase and Amex Reveal About the Credit Card Market

    What Premium Card Overhauls by Chase and Amex Reveal About the Credit Card Market

    July 7, 2025

    Linkedin-in X-twitter
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Commercial
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Digital Banking
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter
    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Sign Up for Our Newsletter

    ©2024 PaymentsJournal.com |  Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

    • Commercial Payments
    • Credit
    • Debit
    • Digital Assets & Crypto
    • Emerging Payments
    • Fraud & Security
    • Merchant
    • Prepaid
    No Result
    View All Result